diff options
author | upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org> | 2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org> | 2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400 |
commit | 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd (patch) | |
tree | 976dc5ab7fddf506dadce60ae936f43f58787092 /gcc/ada/sem.adb | |
download | cbb-gcc-4.6.4-15d2061ac0796199866debe9ac87130894b0cdd3.tar.bz2 cbb-gcc-4.6.4-15d2061ac0796199866debe9ac87130894b0cdd3.tar.xz |
obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream
verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.
downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.
if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/ada/sem.adb')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/ada/sem.adb | 2319 |
1 files changed, 2319 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem.adb b/gcc/ada/sem.adb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4cf2ec740 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/ada/sem.adb @@ -0,0 +1,2319 @@ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------ +-- -- +-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS -- +-- -- +-- S E M -- +-- -- +-- B o d y -- +-- -- +-- Copyright (C) 1992-2010, Free Software Foundation, Inc. -- +-- -- +-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under -- +-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- -- +-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- -- +-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- -- +-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY -- +-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. -- +-- -- +-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along -- +-- with this program; see file COPYING3. If not see -- +-- <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. -- +-- -- +-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. -- +-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. -- +-- -- +------------------------------------------------------------------------------ + +with Atree; use Atree; +with Debug; use Debug; +with Debug_A; use Debug_A; +with Elists; use Elists; +with Errout; use Errout; +with Expander; use Expander; +with Fname; use Fname; +with HLO; use HLO; +with Lib; use Lib; +with Lib.Load; use Lib.Load; +with Nlists; use Nlists; +with Output; use Output; +with Sem_Attr; use Sem_Attr; +with Sem_Ch2; use Sem_Ch2; +with Sem_Ch3; use Sem_Ch3; +with Sem_Ch4; use Sem_Ch4; +with Sem_Ch5; use Sem_Ch5; +with Sem_Ch6; use Sem_Ch6; +with Sem_Ch7; use Sem_Ch7; +with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8; +with Sem_Ch9; use Sem_Ch9; +with Sem_Ch10; use Sem_Ch10; +with Sem_Ch11; use Sem_Ch11; +with Sem_Ch12; use Sem_Ch12; +with Sem_Ch13; use Sem_Ch13; +with Sem_Prag; use Sem_Prag; +with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util; +with Sinfo; use Sinfo; +with Stand; use Stand; +with Uintp; use Uintp; +with Uname; use Uname; + +with Unchecked_Deallocation; + +pragma Warnings (Off, Sem_Util); +-- Suppress warnings of unused with for Sem_Util (used only in asserts) + +package body Sem is + + Debug_Unit_Walk : Boolean renames Debug_Flag_Dot_WW; + -- Controls debugging printouts for Walk_Library_Items + + Outer_Generic_Scope : Entity_Id := Empty; + -- Global reference to the outer scope that is generic. In a non-generic + -- context, it is empty. At the moment, it is only used for avoiding + -- freezing of external references in generics. + + Comp_Unit_List : Elist_Id := No_Elist; + -- Used by Walk_Library_Items. This is a list of N_Compilation_Unit nodes + -- processed by Semantics, in an appropriate order. Initialized to + -- No_Elist, because it's too early to call New_Elmt_List; we will set it + -- to New_Elmt_List on first use. + + generic + with procedure Action (Withed_Unit : Node_Id); + procedure Walk_Withs_Immediate (CU : Node_Id; Include_Limited : Boolean); + -- Walk all the with clauses of CU, and call Action for the with'ed unit. + -- Ignore limited withs, unless Include_Limited is True. CU must be an + -- N_Compilation_Unit. + + generic + with procedure Action (Withed_Unit : Node_Id); + procedure Walk_Withs (CU : Node_Id; Include_Limited : Boolean); + -- Same as Walk_Withs_Immediate, but also include with clauses on subunits + -- of this unit, since they count as dependences on their parent library + -- item. CU must be an N_Compilation_Unit whose Unit is not an N_Subunit. + + procedure Write_Unit_Info + (Unit_Num : Unit_Number_Type; + Item : Node_Id; + Prefix : String := ""; + Withs : Boolean := False); + -- Print out debugging information about the unit. Prefix precedes the rest + -- of the printout. If Withs is True, we print out units with'ed by this + -- unit (not counting limited withs). + + ------------- + -- Analyze -- + ------------- + + procedure Analyze (N : Node_Id) is + begin + Debug_A_Entry ("analyzing ", N); + + -- Immediate return if already analyzed + + if Analyzed (N) then + Debug_A_Exit ("analyzing ", N, " (done, analyzed already)"); + return; + end if; + + -- Otherwise processing depends on the node kind + + case Nkind (N) is + + when N_Abort_Statement => + Analyze_Abort_Statement (N); + + when N_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration => + Analyze_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration (N); + + when N_Accept_Alternative => + Analyze_Accept_Alternative (N); + + when N_Accept_Statement => + Analyze_Accept_Statement (N); + + when N_Aggregate => + Analyze_Aggregate (N); + + when N_Allocator => + Analyze_Allocator (N); + + when N_And_Then => + Analyze_Short_Circuit (N); + + when N_Assignment_Statement => + Analyze_Assignment (N); + + when N_Asynchronous_Select => + Analyze_Asynchronous_Select (N); + + when N_At_Clause => + Analyze_At_Clause (N); + + when N_Attribute_Reference => + Analyze_Attribute (N); + + when N_Attribute_Definition_Clause => + Analyze_Attribute_Definition_Clause (N); + + when N_Block_Statement => + Analyze_Block_Statement (N); + + when N_Case_Expression => + Analyze_Case_Expression (N); + + when N_Case_Statement => + Analyze_Case_Statement (N); + + when N_Character_Literal => + Analyze_Character_Literal (N); + + when N_Code_Statement => + Analyze_Code_Statement (N); + + when N_Compilation_Unit => + Analyze_Compilation_Unit (N); + + when N_Component_Declaration => + Analyze_Component_Declaration (N); + + when N_Conditional_Expression => + Analyze_Conditional_Expression (N); + + when N_Conditional_Entry_Call => + Analyze_Conditional_Entry_Call (N); + + when N_Delay_Alternative => + Analyze_Delay_Alternative (N); + + when N_Delay_Relative_Statement => + Analyze_Delay_Relative (N); + + when N_Delay_Until_Statement => + Analyze_Delay_Until (N); + + when N_Entry_Body => + Analyze_Entry_Body (N); + + when N_Entry_Body_Formal_Part => + Analyze_Entry_Body_Formal_Part (N); + + when N_Entry_Call_Alternative => + Analyze_Entry_Call_Alternative (N); + + when N_Entry_Declaration => + Analyze_Entry_Declaration (N); + + when N_Entry_Index_Specification => + Analyze_Entry_Index_Specification (N); + + when N_Enumeration_Representation_Clause => + Analyze_Enumeration_Representation_Clause (N); + + when N_Exception_Declaration => + Analyze_Exception_Declaration (N); + + when N_Exception_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Exception_Renaming (N); + + when N_Exit_Statement => + Analyze_Exit_Statement (N); + + when N_Expanded_Name => + Analyze_Expanded_Name (N); + + when N_Explicit_Dereference => + Analyze_Explicit_Dereference (N); + + when N_Expression_With_Actions => + Analyze_Expression_With_Actions (N); + + when N_Extended_Return_Statement => + Analyze_Extended_Return_Statement (N); + + when N_Extension_Aggregate => + Analyze_Aggregate (N); + + when N_Formal_Object_Declaration => + Analyze_Formal_Object_Declaration (N); + + when N_Formal_Package_Declaration => + Analyze_Formal_Package_Declaration (N); + + when N_Formal_Subprogram_Declaration => + Analyze_Formal_Subprogram_Declaration (N); + + when N_Formal_Type_Declaration => + Analyze_Formal_Type_Declaration (N); + + when N_Free_Statement => + Analyze_Free_Statement (N); + + when N_Freeze_Entity => + Analyze_Freeze_Entity (N); + + when N_Full_Type_Declaration => + Analyze_Full_Type_Declaration (N); + + when N_Function_Call => + Analyze_Function_Call (N); + + when N_Function_Instantiation => + Analyze_Function_Instantiation (N); + + when N_Generic_Function_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Generic_Function_Renaming (N); + + when N_Generic_Package_Declaration => + Analyze_Generic_Package_Declaration (N); + + when N_Generic_Package_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Generic_Package_Renaming (N); + + when N_Generic_Procedure_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Generic_Procedure_Renaming (N); + + when N_Generic_Subprogram_Declaration => + Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Declaration (N); + + when N_Goto_Statement => + Analyze_Goto_Statement (N); + + when N_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements => + Analyze_Handled_Statements (N); + + when N_Identifier => + Analyze_Identifier (N); + + when N_If_Statement => + Analyze_If_Statement (N); + + when N_Implicit_Label_Declaration => + Analyze_Implicit_Label_Declaration (N); + + when N_In => + Analyze_Membership_Op (N); + + when N_Incomplete_Type_Declaration => + Analyze_Incomplete_Type_Decl (N); + + when N_Indexed_Component => + Analyze_Indexed_Component_Form (N); + + when N_Integer_Literal => + Analyze_Integer_Literal (N); + + when N_Iterator_Specification => + Analyze_Iterator_Specification (N); + + when N_Itype_Reference => + Analyze_Itype_Reference (N); + + when N_Label => + Analyze_Label (N); + + when N_Loop_Statement => + Analyze_Loop_Statement (N); + + when N_Not_In => + Analyze_Membership_Op (N); + + when N_Null => + Analyze_Null (N); + + when N_Null_Statement => + Analyze_Null_Statement (N); + + when N_Number_Declaration => + Analyze_Number_Declaration (N); + + when N_Object_Declaration => + Analyze_Object_Declaration (N); + + when N_Object_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Object_Renaming (N); + + when N_Operator_Symbol => + Analyze_Operator_Symbol (N); + + when N_Op_Abs => + Analyze_Unary_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Add => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_And => + Analyze_Logical_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Concat => + Analyze_Concatenation (N); + + when N_Op_Divide => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Eq => + Analyze_Equality_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Expon => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Ge => + Analyze_Comparison_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Gt => + Analyze_Comparison_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Le => + Analyze_Comparison_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Lt => + Analyze_Comparison_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Minus => + Analyze_Unary_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Mod => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Multiply => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Ne => + Analyze_Equality_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Not => + Analyze_Negation (N); + + when N_Op_Or => + Analyze_Logical_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Plus => + Analyze_Unary_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Rem => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Rotate_Left => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Rotate_Right => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Shift_Left => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Shift_Right => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Shift_Right_Arithmetic => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Subtract => + Analyze_Arithmetic_Op (N); + + when N_Op_Xor => + Analyze_Logical_Op (N); + + when N_Or_Else => + Analyze_Short_Circuit (N); + + when N_Others_Choice => + Analyze_Others_Choice (N); + + when N_Package_Body => + Analyze_Package_Body (N); + + when N_Package_Body_Stub => + Analyze_Package_Body_Stub (N); + + when N_Package_Declaration => + Analyze_Package_Declaration (N); + + when N_Package_Instantiation => + Analyze_Package_Instantiation (N); + + when N_Package_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Package_Renaming (N); + + when N_Package_Specification => + Analyze_Package_Specification (N); + + when N_Parameter_Association => + Analyze_Parameter_Association (N); + + when N_Parameterized_Expression => + Analyze_Parameterized_Expression (N); + + when N_Pragma => + Analyze_Pragma (N); + + when N_Private_Extension_Declaration => + Analyze_Private_Extension_Declaration (N); + + when N_Private_Type_Declaration => + Analyze_Private_Type_Declaration (N); + + when N_Procedure_Call_Statement => + Analyze_Procedure_Call (N); + + when N_Procedure_Instantiation => + Analyze_Procedure_Instantiation (N); + + when N_Protected_Body => + Analyze_Protected_Body (N); + + when N_Protected_Body_Stub => + Analyze_Protected_Body_Stub (N); + + when N_Protected_Definition => + Analyze_Protected_Definition (N); + + when N_Protected_Type_Declaration => + Analyze_Protected_Type_Declaration (N); + + when N_Qualified_Expression => + Analyze_Qualified_Expression (N); + + when N_Quantified_Expression => + Analyze_Quantified_Expression (N); + + when N_Raise_Statement => + Analyze_Raise_Statement (N); + + when N_Raise_xxx_Error => + Analyze_Raise_xxx_Error (N); + + when N_Range => + Analyze_Range (N); + + when N_Range_Constraint => + Analyze_Range (Range_Expression (N)); + + when N_Real_Literal => + Analyze_Real_Literal (N); + + when N_Record_Representation_Clause => + Analyze_Record_Representation_Clause (N); + + when N_Reference => + Analyze_Reference (N); + + when N_Requeue_Statement => + Analyze_Requeue (N); + + when N_Simple_Return_Statement => + Analyze_Simple_Return_Statement (N); + + when N_Selected_Component => + Find_Selected_Component (N); + -- ??? why not Analyze_Selected_Component, needs comments + + when N_Selective_Accept => + Analyze_Selective_Accept (N); + + when N_Single_Protected_Declaration => + Analyze_Single_Protected_Declaration (N); + + when N_Single_Task_Declaration => + Analyze_Single_Task_Declaration (N); + + when N_Slice => + Analyze_Slice (N); + + when N_String_Literal => + Analyze_String_Literal (N); + + when N_Subprogram_Body => + Analyze_Subprogram_Body (N); + + when N_Subprogram_Body_Stub => + Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Stub (N); + + when N_Subprogram_Declaration => + Analyze_Subprogram_Declaration (N); + + when N_Subprogram_Info => + Analyze_Subprogram_Info (N); + + when N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration => + Analyze_Subprogram_Renaming (N); + + when N_Subtype_Declaration => + Analyze_Subtype_Declaration (N); + + when N_Subtype_Indication => + Analyze_Subtype_Indication (N); + + when N_Subunit => + Analyze_Subunit (N); + + when N_Task_Body => + Analyze_Task_Body (N); + + when N_Task_Body_Stub => + Analyze_Task_Body_Stub (N); + + when N_Task_Definition => + Analyze_Task_Definition (N); + + when N_Task_Type_Declaration => + Analyze_Task_Type_Declaration (N); + + when N_Terminate_Alternative => + Analyze_Terminate_Alternative (N); + + when N_Timed_Entry_Call => + Analyze_Timed_Entry_Call (N); + + when N_Triggering_Alternative => + Analyze_Triggering_Alternative (N); + + when N_Type_Conversion => + Analyze_Type_Conversion (N); + + when N_Unchecked_Expression => + Analyze_Unchecked_Expression (N); + + when N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion => + Analyze_Unchecked_Type_Conversion (N); + + when N_Use_Package_Clause => + Analyze_Use_Package (N); + + when N_Use_Type_Clause => + Analyze_Use_Type (N); + + when N_Validate_Unchecked_Conversion => + null; + + when N_Variant_Part => + Analyze_Variant_Part (N); + + when N_With_Clause => + Analyze_With_Clause (N); + + -- A call to analyze the Empty node is an error, but most likely it + -- is an error caused by an attempt to analyze a malformed piece of + -- tree caused by some other error, so if there have been any other + -- errors, we just ignore it, otherwise it is a real internal error + -- which we complain about. + + -- We must also consider the case of call to a runtime function that + -- is not available in the configurable runtime. + + when N_Empty => + pragma Assert (Serious_Errors_Detected /= 0 + or else Configurable_Run_Time_Violations /= 0); + null; + + -- A call to analyze the error node is simply ignored, to avoid + -- causing cascaded errors (happens of course only in error cases) + + when N_Error => + null; + + -- Push/Pop nodes normally don't come through an analyze call. An + -- exception is the dummy ones bracketing a subprogram body. In any + -- case there is nothing to be done to analyze such nodes. + + when N_Push_Pop_xxx_Label => + null; + + -- SCIL nodes don't need analysis because they are decorated when + -- they are built. They are added to the tree by Insert_Actions and + -- the call to analyze them is generated when the full list is + -- analyzed. + + when + N_SCIL_Dispatch_Table_Tag_Init | + N_SCIL_Dispatching_Call | + N_SCIL_Membership_Test => + null; + + -- For the remaining node types, we generate compiler abort, because + -- these nodes are always analyzed within the Sem_Chn routines and + -- there should never be a case of making a call to the main Analyze + -- routine for these node kinds. For example, an N_Access_Definition + -- node appears only in the context of a type declaration, and is + -- processed by the analyze routine for type declarations. + + when + N_Abortable_Part | + N_Access_Definition | + N_Access_Function_Definition | + N_Access_Procedure_Definition | + N_Access_To_Object_Definition | + N_Aspect_Specification | + N_Case_Expression_Alternative | + N_Case_Statement_Alternative | + N_Compilation_Unit_Aux | + N_Component_Association | + N_Component_Clause | + N_Component_Definition | + N_Component_List | + N_Constrained_Array_Definition | + N_Decimal_Fixed_Point_Definition | + N_Defining_Character_Literal | + N_Defining_Identifier | + N_Defining_Operator_Symbol | + N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name | + N_Delta_Constraint | + N_Derived_Type_Definition | + N_Designator | + N_Digits_Constraint | + N_Discriminant_Association | + N_Discriminant_Specification | + N_Elsif_Part | + N_Entry_Call_Statement | + N_Enumeration_Type_Definition | + N_Exception_Handler | + N_Floating_Point_Definition | + N_Formal_Decimal_Fixed_Point_Definition | + N_Formal_Derived_Type_Definition | + N_Formal_Discrete_Type_Definition | + N_Formal_Floating_Point_Definition | + N_Formal_Modular_Type_Definition | + N_Formal_Ordinary_Fixed_Point_Definition | + N_Formal_Private_Type_Definition | + N_Formal_Signed_Integer_Type_Definition | + N_Function_Specification | + N_Generic_Association | + N_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint | + N_Iteration_Scheme | + N_Loop_Parameter_Specification | + N_Mod_Clause | + N_Modular_Type_Definition | + N_Ordinary_Fixed_Point_Definition | + N_Parameter_Specification | + N_Pragma_Argument_Association | + N_Procedure_Specification | + N_Real_Range_Specification | + N_Record_Definition | + N_Signed_Integer_Type_Definition | + N_Unconstrained_Array_Definition | + N_Unused_At_Start | + N_Unused_At_End | + N_Variant => + + raise Program_Error; + end case; + + Debug_A_Exit ("analyzing ", N, " (done)"); + + -- Now that we have analyzed the node, we call the expander to perform + -- possible expansion. We skip this for subexpressions, because we don't + -- have the type yet, and the expander will need to know the type before + -- it can do its job. For subexpression nodes, the call to the expander + -- happens in Sem_Res.Resolve. A special exception is Raise_xxx_Error, + -- which can appear in a statement context, and needs expanding now in + -- the case (distinguished by Etype, as documented in Sinfo). + + -- The Analyzed flag is also set at this point for non-subexpression + -- nodes (in the case of subexpression nodes, we can't set the flag yet, + -- since resolution and expansion have not yet been completed). Note + -- that for N_Raise_xxx_Error we have to distinguish the expression + -- case from the statement case. + + if Nkind (N) not in N_Subexpr + or else (Nkind (N) in N_Raise_xxx_Error + and then Etype (N) = Standard_Void_Type) + then + Expand (N); + end if; + end Analyze; + + -- Version with check(s) suppressed + + procedure Analyze (N : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id) is + begin + if Suppress = All_Checks then + declare + Svg : constant Suppress_Array := Scope_Suppress; + begin + Scope_Suppress := (others => True); + Analyze (N); + Scope_Suppress := Svg; + end; + + else + declare + Svg : constant Boolean := Scope_Suppress (Suppress); + begin + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := True; + Analyze (N); + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := Svg; + end; + end if; + end Analyze; + + ------------------ + -- Analyze_List -- + ------------------ + + procedure Analyze_List (L : List_Id) is + Node : Node_Id; + + begin + Node := First (L); + while Present (Node) loop + Analyze (Node); + Next (Node); + end loop; + end Analyze_List; + + -- Version with check(s) suppressed + + procedure Analyze_List (L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id) is + begin + if Suppress = All_Checks then + declare + Svg : constant Suppress_Array := Scope_Suppress; + begin + Scope_Suppress := (others => True); + Analyze_List (L); + Scope_Suppress := Svg; + end; + + else + declare + Svg : constant Boolean := Scope_Suppress (Suppress); + begin + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := True; + Analyze_List (L); + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := Svg; + end; + end if; + end Analyze_List; + + -------------------------- + -- Copy_Suppress_Status -- + -------------------------- + + procedure Copy_Suppress_Status + (C : Check_Id; + From : Entity_Id; + To : Entity_Id) + is + Found : Boolean; + pragma Warnings (Off, Found); + + procedure Search_Stack + (Top : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr; + Found : out Boolean); + -- Search given suppress stack for matching entry for entity. If found + -- then set Checks_May_Be_Suppressed on To, and push an appropriate + -- entry for To onto the local suppress stack. + + ------------------ + -- Search_Stack -- + ------------------ + + procedure Search_Stack + (Top : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr; + Found : out Boolean) + is + Ptr : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr; + + begin + Ptr := Top; + while Ptr /= null loop + if Ptr.Entity = From + and then (Ptr.Check = All_Checks or else Ptr.Check = C) + then + if Ptr.Suppress then + Set_Checks_May_Be_Suppressed (To, True); + Push_Local_Suppress_Stack_Entry + (Entity => To, + Check => C, + Suppress => True); + Found := True; + return; + end if; + end if; + + Ptr := Ptr.Prev; + end loop; + + Found := False; + return; + end Search_Stack; + + -- Start of processing for Copy_Suppress_Status + + begin + if not Checks_May_Be_Suppressed (From) then + return; + end if; + + -- First search the local entity suppress stack, we search this in + -- reverse order so that we get the innermost entry that applies to + -- this case if there are nested entries. Note that for the purpose + -- of this procedure we are ONLY looking for entries corresponding + -- to a two-argument Suppress, where the second argument matches From. + + Search_Stack (Global_Suppress_Stack_Top, Found); + + if Found then + return; + end if; + + -- Now search the global entity suppress table for a matching entry. + -- We also search this in reverse order so that if there are multiple + -- pragmas for the same entity, the last one applies. + + Search_Stack (Local_Suppress_Stack_Top, Found); + end Copy_Suppress_Status; + + ------------------------- + -- Enter_Generic_Scope -- + ------------------------- + + procedure Enter_Generic_Scope (S : Entity_Id) is + begin + if No (Outer_Generic_Scope) then + Outer_Generic_Scope := S; + end if; + end Enter_Generic_Scope; + + ------------------------ + -- Exit_Generic_Scope -- + ------------------------ + + procedure Exit_Generic_Scope (S : Entity_Id) is + begin + if S = Outer_Generic_Scope then + Outer_Generic_Scope := Empty; + end if; + end Exit_Generic_Scope; + + ----------------------- + -- Explicit_Suppress -- + ----------------------- + + function Explicit_Suppress (E : Entity_Id; C : Check_Id) return Boolean is + Ptr : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr; + + begin + if not Checks_May_Be_Suppressed (E) then + return False; + + else + Ptr := Global_Suppress_Stack_Top; + while Ptr /= null loop + if Ptr.Entity = E + and then (Ptr.Check = All_Checks or else Ptr.Check = C) + then + return Ptr.Suppress; + end if; + + Ptr := Ptr.Prev; + end loop; + end if; + + return False; + end Explicit_Suppress; + + ----------------------------- + -- External_Ref_In_Generic -- + ----------------------------- + + function External_Ref_In_Generic (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is + Scop : Entity_Id; + + begin + -- Entity is global if defined outside of current outer_generic_scope: + -- Either the entity has a smaller depth that the outer generic, or it + -- is in a different compilation unit, or it is defined within a unit + -- in the same compilation, that is not within the outer_generic. + + if No (Outer_Generic_Scope) then + return False; + + elsif Scope_Depth (Scope (E)) < Scope_Depth (Outer_Generic_Scope) + or else not In_Same_Source_Unit (E, Outer_Generic_Scope) + then + return True; + + else + Scop := Scope (E); + + while Present (Scop) loop + if Scop = Outer_Generic_Scope then + return False; + elsif Scope_Depth (Scop) < Scope_Depth (Outer_Generic_Scope) then + return True; + else + Scop := Scope (Scop); + end if; + end loop; + + return True; + end if; + end External_Ref_In_Generic; + + ---------------- + -- Initialize -- + ---------------- + + procedure Initialize is + Next : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr; + + procedure Free is new Unchecked_Deallocation + (Suppress_Stack_Entry, Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr); + + begin + -- Free any global suppress stack entries from a previous invocation + -- of the compiler (in the normal case this loop does nothing). + + while Suppress_Stack_Entries /= null loop + Next := Global_Suppress_Stack_Top.Next; + Free (Suppress_Stack_Entries); + Suppress_Stack_Entries := Next; + end loop; + + Local_Suppress_Stack_Top := null; + Global_Suppress_Stack_Top := null; + + -- Clear scope stack, and reset global variables + + Scope_Stack.Init; + Unloaded_Subunits := False; + end Initialize; + + ------------------------------ + -- Insert_After_And_Analyze -- + ------------------------------ + + procedure Insert_After_And_Analyze (N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id) is + Node : Node_Id; + + begin + if Present (M) then + + -- If we are not at the end of the list, then the easiest + -- coding is simply to insert before our successor + + if Present (Next (N)) then + Insert_Before_And_Analyze (Next (N), M); + + -- Case of inserting at the end of the list + + else + -- Capture the Node_Id of the node to be inserted. This Node_Id + -- will still be the same after the insert operation. + + Node := M; + Insert_After (N, M); + + -- Now just analyze from the inserted node to the end of + -- the new list (note that this properly handles the case + -- where any of the analyze calls result in the insertion of + -- nodes after the analyzed node, expecting analysis). + + while Present (Node) loop + Analyze (Node); + Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Node); + Next (Node); + end loop; + end if; + end if; + end Insert_After_And_Analyze; + + -- Version with check(s) suppressed + + procedure Insert_After_And_Analyze + (N : Node_Id; + M : Node_Id; + Suppress : Check_Id) + is + begin + if Suppress = All_Checks then + declare + Svg : constant Suppress_Array := Scope_Suppress; + begin + Scope_Suppress := (others => True); + Insert_After_And_Analyze (N, M); + Scope_Suppress := Svg; + end; + + else + declare + Svg : constant Boolean := Scope_Suppress (Suppress); + begin + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := True; + Insert_After_And_Analyze (N, M); + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := Svg; + end; + end if; + end Insert_After_And_Analyze; + + ------------------------------- + -- Insert_Before_And_Analyze -- + ------------------------------- + + procedure Insert_Before_And_Analyze (N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id) is + Node : Node_Id; + + begin + if Present (M) then + + -- Capture the Node_Id of the first list node to be inserted. + -- This will still be the first node after the insert operation, + -- since Insert_List_After does not modify the Node_Id values. + + Node := M; + Insert_Before (N, M); + + -- The insertion does not change the Id's of any of the nodes in + -- the list, and they are still linked, so we can simply loop from + -- the original first node until we meet the node before which the + -- insertion is occurring. Note that this properly handles the case + -- where any of the analyzed nodes insert nodes after themselves, + -- expecting them to get analyzed. + + while Node /= N loop + Analyze (Node); + Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Node); + Next (Node); + end loop; + end if; + end Insert_Before_And_Analyze; + + -- Version with check(s) suppressed + + procedure Insert_Before_And_Analyze + (N : Node_Id; + M : Node_Id; + Suppress : Check_Id) + is + begin + if Suppress = All_Checks then + declare + Svg : constant Suppress_Array := Scope_Suppress; + begin + Scope_Suppress := (others => True); + Insert_Before_And_Analyze (N, M); + Scope_Suppress := Svg; + end; + + else + declare + Svg : constant Boolean := Scope_Suppress (Suppress); + begin + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := True; + Insert_Before_And_Analyze (N, M); + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := Svg; + end; + end if; + end Insert_Before_And_Analyze; + + ----------------------------------- + -- Insert_List_After_And_Analyze -- + ----------------------------------- + + procedure Insert_List_After_And_Analyze (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id) is + After : constant Node_Id := Next (N); + Node : Node_Id; + + begin + if Is_Non_Empty_List (L) then + + -- Capture the Node_Id of the first list node to be inserted. + -- This will still be the first node after the insert operation, + -- since Insert_List_After does not modify the Node_Id values. + + Node := First (L); + Insert_List_After (N, L); + + -- Now just analyze from the original first node until we get to the + -- successor of the original insertion point (which may be Empty if + -- the insertion point was at the end of the list). Note that this + -- properly handles the case where any of the analyze calls result in + -- the insertion of nodes after the analyzed node (possibly calling + -- this routine recursively). + + while Node /= After loop + Analyze (Node); + Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Node); + Next (Node); + end loop; + end if; + end Insert_List_After_And_Analyze; + + -- Version with check(s) suppressed + + procedure Insert_List_After_And_Analyze + (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id) + is + begin + if Suppress = All_Checks then + declare + Svg : constant Suppress_Array := Scope_Suppress; + begin + Scope_Suppress := (others => True); + Insert_List_After_And_Analyze (N, L); + Scope_Suppress := Svg; + end; + + else + declare + Svg : constant Boolean := Scope_Suppress (Suppress); + begin + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := True; + Insert_List_After_And_Analyze (N, L); + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := Svg; + end; + end if; + end Insert_List_After_And_Analyze; + + ------------------------------------ + -- Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze -- + ------------------------------------ + + procedure Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id) is + Node : Node_Id; + + begin + if Is_Non_Empty_List (L) then + + -- Capture the Node_Id of the first list node to be inserted. This + -- will still be the first node after the insert operation, since + -- Insert_List_After does not modify the Node_Id values. + + Node := First (L); + Insert_List_Before (N, L); + + -- The insertion does not change the Id's of any of the nodes in + -- the list, and they are still linked, so we can simply loop from + -- the original first node until we meet the node before which the + -- insertion is occurring. Note that this properly handles the case + -- where any of the analyzed nodes insert nodes after themselves, + -- expecting them to get analyzed. + + while Node /= N loop + Analyze (Node); + Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Node); + Next (Node); + end loop; + end if; + end Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze; + + -- Version with check(s) suppressed + + procedure Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze + (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id) + is + begin + if Suppress = All_Checks then + declare + Svg : constant Suppress_Array := Scope_Suppress; + begin + Scope_Suppress := (others => True); + Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (N, L); + Scope_Suppress := Svg; + end; + + else + declare + Svg : constant Boolean := Scope_Suppress (Suppress); + begin + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := True; + Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (N, L); + Scope_Suppress (Suppress) := Svg; + end; + end if; + end Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze; + + ------------------------- + -- Is_Check_Suppressed -- + ------------------------- + + function Is_Check_Suppressed (E : Entity_Id; C : Check_Id) return Boolean is + + Ptr : Suppress_Stack_Entry_Ptr; + + begin + -- First search the local entity suppress stack. We search this from the + -- top of the stack down so that we get the innermost entry that applies + -- to this case if there are nested entries. + + Ptr := Local_Suppress_Stack_Top; + while Ptr /= null loop + if (Ptr.Entity = Empty or else Ptr.Entity = E) + and then (Ptr.Check = All_Checks or else Ptr.Check = C) + then + return Ptr.Suppress; + end if; + + Ptr := Ptr.Prev; + end loop; + + -- Now search the global entity suppress table for a matching entry. + -- We also search this from the top down so that if there are multiple + -- pragmas for the same entity, the last one applies (not clear what + -- or whether the RM specifies this handling, but it seems reasonable). + + Ptr := Global_Suppress_Stack_Top; + while Ptr /= null loop + if (Ptr.Entity = Empty or else Ptr.Entity = E) + and then (Ptr.Check = All_Checks or else Ptr.Check = C) + then + return Ptr.Suppress; + end if; + + Ptr := Ptr.Prev; + end loop; + + -- If we did not find a matching entry, then use the normal scope + -- suppress value after all (actually this will be the global setting + -- since it clearly was not overridden at any point). For a predefined + -- check, we test the specific flag. For a user defined check, we check + -- the All_Checks flag. + + if C in Predefined_Check_Id then + return Scope_Suppress (C); + else + return Scope_Suppress (All_Checks); + end if; + end Is_Check_Suppressed; + + ---------- + -- Lock -- + ---------- + + procedure Lock is + begin + Scope_Stack.Locked := True; + Scope_Stack.Release; + end Lock; + + -------------------------------------- + -- Push_Global_Suppress_Stack_Entry -- + -------------------------------------- + + procedure Push_Global_Suppress_Stack_Entry + (Entity : Entity_Id; + Check : Check_Id; + Suppress : Boolean) + is + begin + Global_Suppress_Stack_Top := + new Suppress_Stack_Entry' + (Entity => Entity, + Check => Check, + Suppress => Suppress, + Prev => Global_Suppress_Stack_Top, + Next => Suppress_Stack_Entries); + Suppress_Stack_Entries := Global_Suppress_Stack_Top; + return; + + end Push_Global_Suppress_Stack_Entry; + + ------------------------------------- + -- Push_Local_Suppress_Stack_Entry -- + ------------------------------------- + + procedure Push_Local_Suppress_Stack_Entry + (Entity : Entity_Id; + Check : Check_Id; + Suppress : Boolean) + is + begin + Local_Suppress_Stack_Top := + new Suppress_Stack_Entry' + (Entity => Entity, + Check => Check, + Suppress => Suppress, + Prev => Local_Suppress_Stack_Top, + Next => Suppress_Stack_Entries); + Suppress_Stack_Entries := Local_Suppress_Stack_Top; + + return; + end Push_Local_Suppress_Stack_Entry; + + --------------- + -- Semantics -- + --------------- + + procedure Semantics (Comp_Unit : Node_Id) is + + -- The following locations save the corresponding global flags and + -- variables so that they can be restored on completion. This is needed + -- so that calls to Rtsfind start with the proper default values for + -- these variables, and also that such calls do not disturb the settings + -- for units being analyzed at a higher level. + + S_Current_Sem_Unit : constant Unit_Number_Type := Current_Sem_Unit; + S_Full_Analysis : constant Boolean := Full_Analysis; + S_GNAT_Mode : constant Boolean := GNAT_Mode; + S_Global_Dis_Names : constant Boolean := Global_Discard_Names; + S_In_Spec_Expr : constant Boolean := In_Spec_Expression; + S_Inside_A_Generic : constant Boolean := Inside_A_Generic; + S_New_Nodes_OK : constant Int := New_Nodes_OK; + S_Outer_Gen_Scope : constant Entity_Id := Outer_Generic_Scope; + + Generic_Main : constant Boolean := + Nkind (Unit (Cunit (Main_Unit))) + in N_Generic_Declaration; + -- If the main unit is generic, every compiled unit, including its + -- context, is compiled with expansion disabled. + + Save_Config_Switches : Config_Switches_Type; + -- Variable used to save values of config switches while we analyze the + -- new unit, to be restored on exit for proper recursive behavior. + + procedure Do_Analyze; + -- Procedure to analyze the compilation unit. This is called more than + -- once when the high level optimizer is activated. + + ---------------- + -- Do_Analyze -- + ---------------- + + procedure Do_Analyze is + begin + Save_Scope_Stack; + Push_Scope (Standard_Standard); + Scope_Suppress := Suppress_Options; + Scope_Stack.Table + (Scope_Stack.Last).Component_Alignment_Default := Calign_Default; + Scope_Stack.Table + (Scope_Stack.Last).Is_Active_Stack_Base := True; + Outer_Generic_Scope := Empty; + + -- Now analyze the top level compilation unit node + + Analyze (Comp_Unit); + + -- Check for scope mismatch on exit from compilation + + pragma Assert (Current_Scope = Standard_Standard + or else Comp_Unit = Cunit (Main_Unit)); + + -- Then pop entry for Standard, and pop implicit types + + Pop_Scope; + Restore_Scope_Stack; + end Do_Analyze; + + Already_Analyzed : constant Boolean := Analyzed (Comp_Unit); + + -- Start of processing for Semantics + + begin + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + if Already_Analyzed then + Write_Str ("(done)"); + end if; + + Write_Unit_Info + (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Comp_Unit), + Unit (Comp_Unit), + Prefix => "--> "); + Indent; + end if; + + Compiler_State := Analyzing; + Current_Sem_Unit := Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Comp_Unit); + + -- Compile predefined units with GNAT_Mode set to True, to properly + -- process the categorization stuff. However, do not set GNAT_Mode + -- to True for the renamings units (Text_IO, IO_Exceptions, Direct_IO, + -- Sequential_IO) as this would prevent pragma Extend_System from being + -- taken into account, for example when Text_IO is renaming DEC.Text_IO. + + -- Cleaner might be to do the kludge at the point of excluding the + -- pragma (do not exclude for renamings ???) + + if Is_Predefined_File_Name + (Unit_File_Name (Current_Sem_Unit), Renamings_Included => False) + then + GNAT_Mode := True; + end if; + + if Generic_Main then + Expander_Mode_Save_And_Set (False); + else + Expander_Mode_Save_And_Set + (Operating_Mode = Generate_Code or Debug_Flag_X); + end if; + + Full_Analysis := True; + Inside_A_Generic := False; + In_Spec_Expression := False; + + Set_Comes_From_Source_Default (False); + Save_Opt_Config_Switches (Save_Config_Switches); + Set_Opt_Config_Switches + (Is_Internal_File_Name (Unit_File_Name (Current_Sem_Unit)), + Current_Sem_Unit = Main_Unit); + + -- Only do analysis of unit that has not already been analyzed + + if not Analyzed (Comp_Unit) then + Initialize_Version (Current_Sem_Unit); + if HLO_Active then + Expander_Mode_Save_And_Set (False); + New_Nodes_OK := 1; + Do_Analyze; + Reset_Analyzed_Flags (Comp_Unit); + Expander_Mode_Restore; + High_Level_Optimize (Comp_Unit); + New_Nodes_OK := 0; + end if; + + -- Do analysis, and then append the compilation unit onto the + -- Comp_Unit_List, if appropriate. This is done after analysis, + -- so if this unit depends on some others, they have already been + -- appended. We ignore bodies, except for the main unit itself, and + -- for subprogram bodies that act as specs. We have also to guard + -- against ill-formed subunits that have an improper context. + + Do_Analyze; + + if Present (Comp_Unit) + and then Nkind (Unit (Comp_Unit)) in N_Proper_Body + and then (Nkind (Unit (Comp_Unit)) /= N_Subprogram_Body + or else not Acts_As_Spec (Comp_Unit)) + and then not In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (Comp_Unit) + then + null; + + else + -- Initialize if first time + + if No (Comp_Unit_List) then + Comp_Unit_List := New_Elmt_List; + end if; + + Append_Elmt (Comp_Unit, Comp_Unit_List); + + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + Write_Str ("Appending "); + Write_Unit_Info + (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Comp_Unit), Unit (Comp_Unit)); + end if; + end if; + end if; + + -- Save indication of dynamic elaboration checks for ALI file + + Set_Dynamic_Elab (Current_Sem_Unit, Dynamic_Elaboration_Checks); + + -- Restore settings of saved switches to entry values + + Current_Sem_Unit := S_Current_Sem_Unit; + Full_Analysis := S_Full_Analysis; + Global_Discard_Names := S_Global_Dis_Names; + GNAT_Mode := S_GNAT_Mode; + In_Spec_Expression := S_In_Spec_Expr; + Inside_A_Generic := S_Inside_A_Generic; + New_Nodes_OK := S_New_Nodes_OK; + Outer_Generic_Scope := S_Outer_Gen_Scope; + + Restore_Opt_Config_Switches (Save_Config_Switches); + Expander_Mode_Restore; + + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + Outdent; + + if Already_Analyzed then + Write_Str ("(done)"); + end if; + + Write_Unit_Info + (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Comp_Unit), + Unit (Comp_Unit), + Prefix => "<-- "); + end if; + end Semantics; + + ------------------------ + -- Walk_Library_Items -- + ------------------------ + + procedure Walk_Library_Items is + type Unit_Number_Set is array (Main_Unit .. Last_Unit) of Boolean; + pragma Pack (Unit_Number_Set); + + Main_CU : constant Node_Id := Cunit (Main_Unit); + + Seen, Done : Unit_Number_Set := (others => False); + -- Seen (X) is True after we have seen unit X in the walk. This is used + -- to prevent processing the same unit more than once. Done (X) is True + -- after we have fully processed X, and is used only for debugging + -- printouts and assertions. + + Do_Main : Boolean := False; + -- Flag to delay processing the main body until after all other units. + -- This is needed because the spec of the main unit may appear in the + -- context of some other unit. We do not want this to force processing + -- of the main body before all other units have been processed. + -- + -- Another circularity pattern occurs when the main unit is a child unit + -- and the body of an ancestor has a with-clause of the main unit or on + -- one of its children. In both cases the body in question has a with- + -- clause on the main unit, and must be excluded from the traversal. In + -- some convoluted cases this may lead to a CodePeer error because the + -- spec of a subprogram declared in an instance within the parent will + -- not be seen in the main unit. + + function Depends_On_Main (CU : Node_Id) return Boolean; + -- The body of a unit that is withed by the spec of the main unit may in + -- turn have a with_clause on that spec. In that case do not traverse + -- the body, to prevent loops. It can also happen that the main body has + -- a with_clause on a child, which of course has an implicit with on its + -- parent. It's OK to traverse the child body if the main spec has been + -- processed, otherwise we also have a circularity to avoid. + + procedure Do_Action (CU : Node_Id; Item : Node_Id); + -- Calls Action, with some validity checks + + procedure Do_Unit_And_Dependents (CU : Node_Id; Item : Node_Id); + -- Calls Do_Action, first on the units with'ed by this one, then on + -- this unit. If it's an instance body, do the spec first. If it is + -- an instance spec, do the body last. + + procedure Do_Withed_Unit (Withed_Unit : Node_Id); + -- Apply Do_Unit_And_Dependents to a unit in a context clause. + + procedure Process_Bodies_In_Context (Comp : Node_Id); + -- The main unit and its spec may depend on bodies that contain generics + -- that are instantiated in them. Iterate through the corresponding + -- contexts before processing main (spec/body) itself, to process bodies + -- that may be present, together with their context. The spec of main + -- is processed wherever it appears in the list of units, while the body + -- is processed as the last unit in the list. + + --------------------- + -- Depends_On_Main -- + --------------------- + + function Depends_On_Main (CU : Node_Id) return Boolean is + CL : Node_Id; + MCU : constant Node_Id := Unit (Main_CU); + + begin + CL := First (Context_Items (CU)); + + -- Problem does not arise with main subprograms + + if + not Nkind_In (MCU, N_Package_Body, N_Package_Declaration) + then + return False; + end if; + + while Present (CL) loop + if Nkind (CL) = N_With_Clause + and then Library_Unit (CL) = Main_CU + and then not Done (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Library_Unit (CL))) + then + return True; + end if; + + Next (CL); + end loop; + + return False; + end Depends_On_Main; + + --------------- + -- Do_Action -- + --------------- + + procedure Do_Action (CU : Node_Id; Item : Node_Id) is + begin + -- This calls Action at the end. All the preceding code is just + -- assertions and debugging output. + + pragma Assert (No (CU) or else Nkind (CU) = N_Compilation_Unit); + + case Nkind (Item) is + when N_Generic_Subprogram_Declaration | + N_Generic_Package_Declaration | + N_Package_Declaration | + N_Subprogram_Declaration | + N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration | + N_Package_Renaming_Declaration | + N_Generic_Function_Renaming_Declaration | + N_Generic_Package_Renaming_Declaration | + N_Generic_Procedure_Renaming_Declaration => + + -- Specs are OK + + null; + + when N_Package_Body => + + -- Package bodies are processed separately if the main unit + -- depends on them. + + null; + + when N_Subprogram_Body => + + -- A subprogram body must be the main unit + + pragma Assert (Acts_As_Spec (CU) + or else CU = Cunit (Main_Unit)); + null; + + when N_Function_Instantiation | + N_Procedure_Instantiation | + N_Package_Instantiation => + + -- Can only happen if some generic body (needed for gnat2scil + -- traversal, but not by GNAT) is not available, ignore. + + null; + + -- All other cases cannot happen + + when N_Subunit => + pragma Assert (False, "subunit"); + null; + + when others => + pragma Assert (False); + null; + end case; + + if Present (CU) then + pragma Assert (Item /= Stand.Standard_Package_Node); + pragma Assert (Item = Unit (CU)); + + declare + Unit_Num : constant Unit_Number_Type := + Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (CU); + + procedure Assert_Done (Withed_Unit : Node_Id); + -- Assert Withed_Unit is already Done, unless it's a body. It + -- might seem strange for a with_clause to refer to a body, but + -- this happens in the case of a generic instantiation, which + -- gets transformed into the instance body (and the instance + -- spec is also created). With clauses pointing to the + -- instantiation end up pointing to the instance body. + + ----------------- + -- Assert_Done -- + ----------------- + + procedure Assert_Done (Withed_Unit : Node_Id) is + begin + if not Done (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Withed_Unit)) then + if not Nkind_In + (Unit (Withed_Unit), + N_Generic_Package_Declaration, + N_Package_Body, + N_Package_Renaming_Declaration, + N_Subprogram_Body) + then + Write_Unit_Name + (Unit_Name (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Withed_Unit))); + Write_Str (" not yet walked!"); + + if Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Withed_Unit) = Unit_Num then + Write_Str (" (self-ref)"); + end if; + + Write_Eol; + + pragma Assert (False); + end if; + end if; + end Assert_Done; + + procedure Assert_Withed_Units_Done is + new Walk_Withs (Assert_Done); + + begin + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + Write_Unit_Info (Unit_Num, Item, Withs => True); + end if; + + -- Main unit should come last, except in the case where we + -- skipped System_Aux_Id, in which case we missed the things it + -- depends on, and in the case of parent bodies if present. + + pragma Assert + (not Done (Main_Unit) + or else Present (System_Aux_Id) + or else Nkind (Item) = N_Package_Body); + + -- We shouldn't do the same thing twice + + pragma Assert (not Done (Unit_Num)); + + -- Everything we depend upon should already be done + + pragma Debug + (Assert_Withed_Units_Done (CU, Include_Limited => False)); + end; + + else + -- Must be Standard, which has no entry in the units table + + pragma Assert (Item = Stand.Standard_Package_Node); + + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + Write_Line ("Standard"); + end if; + end if; + + Action (Item); + end Do_Action; + + -------------------- + -- Do_Withed_Unit -- + -------------------- + + procedure Do_Withed_Unit (Withed_Unit : Node_Id) is + begin + Do_Unit_And_Dependents (Withed_Unit, Unit (Withed_Unit)); + + -- If the unit in the with_clause is a generic instance, the clause + -- now denotes the instance body. Traverse the corresponding spec + -- because there may be no other dependence that will force the + -- traversal of its own context. + + if Nkind (Unit (Withed_Unit)) = N_Package_Body + and then Is_Generic_Instance + (Defining_Entity (Unit (Library_Unit (Withed_Unit)))) + then + Do_Withed_Unit (Library_Unit (Withed_Unit)); + end if; + end Do_Withed_Unit; + + ---------------------------- + -- Do_Unit_And_Dependents -- + ---------------------------- + + procedure Do_Unit_And_Dependents (CU : Node_Id; Item : Node_Id) is + Unit_Num : constant Unit_Number_Type := Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (CU); + Child : Node_Id; + Body_U : Unit_Number_Type; + Parent_CU : Node_Id; + + procedure Do_Withed_Units is new Walk_Withs (Do_Withed_Unit); + + begin + if not Seen (Unit_Num) then + + -- Process the with clauses + + Do_Withed_Units (CU, Include_Limited => False); + + -- Process the unit if it is a spec or the main unit, if it + -- has no previous spec or we have done all other units. + + if not Nkind_In (Item, N_Package_Body, N_Subprogram_Body) + or else Acts_As_Spec (CU) + then + if CU = Cunit (Main_Unit) + and then not Do_Main + then + Seen (Unit_Num) := False; + + else + Seen (Unit_Num) := True; + + if CU = Library_Unit (Main_CU) then + Process_Bodies_In_Context (CU); + + -- If main is a child unit, examine parent unit contexts + -- to see if they include instantiated units. Also, if + -- the parent itself is an instance, process its body + -- because it may contain subprograms that are called + -- in the main unit. + + if Is_Child_Unit (Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit)) then + Child := Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit); + while Is_Child_Unit (Child) loop + Parent_CU := + Cunit + (Get_Cunit_Entity_Unit_Number (Scope (Child))); + Process_Bodies_In_Context (Parent_CU); + + if Nkind (Unit (Parent_CU)) = N_Package_Body + and then + Nkind (Original_Node (Unit (Parent_CU))) + = N_Package_Instantiation + and then + not Seen (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Parent_CU)) + then + Body_U := Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Parent_CU); + Seen (Body_U) := True; + Do_Action (Parent_CU, Unit (Parent_CU)); + Done (Body_U) := True; + end if; + + Child := Scope (Child); + end loop; + end if; + end if; + + Do_Action (CU, Item); + Done (Unit_Num) := True; + end if; + end if; + end if; + end Do_Unit_And_Dependents; + + ------------------------------- + -- Process_Bodies_In_Context -- + ------------------------------- + + procedure Process_Bodies_In_Context (Comp : Node_Id) is + Body_CU : Node_Id; + Body_U : Unit_Number_Type; + Clause : Node_Id; + Spec : Node_Id; + + procedure Do_Withed_Units is new Walk_Withs (Do_Withed_Unit); + + -- Start of processing for Process_Bodies_In_Context + + begin + Clause := First (Context_Items (Comp)); + while Present (Clause) loop + if Nkind (Clause) = N_With_Clause then + Spec := Library_Unit (Clause); + Body_CU := Library_Unit (Spec); + + -- If we are processing the spec of the main unit, load bodies + -- only if the with_clause indicates that it forced the loading + -- of the body for a generic instantiation. Note that bodies of + -- parents that are instances have been loaded already. + + if Present (Body_CU) + and then Body_CU /= Cunit (Main_Unit) + and then Nkind (Unit (Body_CU)) /= N_Subprogram_Body + and then (Nkind (Unit (Comp)) /= N_Package_Declaration + or else Present (Withed_Body (Clause))) + then + Body_U := Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Body_CU); + + if not Seen (Body_U) + and then not Depends_On_Main (Body_CU) + then + Seen (Body_U) := True; + Do_Withed_Units (Body_CU, Include_Limited => False); + Do_Action (Body_CU, Unit (Body_CU)); + Done (Body_U) := True; + end if; + end if; + end if; + + Next (Clause); + end loop; + end Process_Bodies_In_Context; + + -- Local Declarations + + Cur : Elmt_Id; + + -- Start of processing for Walk_Library_Items + + begin + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + Write_Line ("Walk_Library_Items:"); + Indent; + end if; + + -- Do Standard first, then walk the Comp_Unit_List + + Do_Action (Empty, Standard_Package_Node); + + -- First place the context of all instance bodies on the corresponding + -- spec, because it may be needed to analyze the code at the place of + -- the instantiation. + + Cur := First_Elmt (Comp_Unit_List); + while Present (Cur) loop + declare + CU : constant Node_Id := Node (Cur); + N : constant Node_Id := Unit (CU); + + begin + if Nkind (N) = N_Package_Body + and then Is_Generic_Instance (Defining_Entity (N)) + then + Append_List + (Context_Items (CU), Context_Items (Library_Unit (CU))); + end if; + + Next_Elmt (Cur); + end; + end loop; + + -- Now traverse compilation units (specs) in order + + Cur := First_Elmt (Comp_Unit_List); + while Present (Cur) loop + declare + CU : constant Node_Id := Node (Cur); + N : constant Node_Id := Unit (CU); + Par : Entity_Id; + + begin + pragma Assert (Nkind (CU) = N_Compilation_Unit); + + case Nkind (N) is + + -- If it is a subprogram body, process it if it has no + -- separate spec. + + -- If it's a package body, ignore it, unless it is a body + -- created for an instance that is the main unit. In the case + -- of subprograms, the body is the wrapper package. In case of + -- a package, the original file carries the body, and the spec + -- appears as a later entry in the units list. + + -- Otherwise bodies appear in the list only because of inlining + -- or instantiations, and they are processed only if relevant. + -- The flag Withed_Body on a context clause indicates that a + -- unit contains an instantiation that may be needed later, + -- and therefore the body that contains the generic body (and + -- its context) must be traversed immediately after the + -- corresponding spec (see Do_Unit_And_Dependents). + + -- The main unit itself is processed separately after all other + -- specs, and relevant bodies are examined in Process_Main. + + when N_Subprogram_Body => + if Acts_As_Spec (N) then + Do_Unit_And_Dependents (CU, N); + end if; + + when N_Package_Body => + if CU = Main_CU + and then Nkind (Original_Node (Unit (Main_CU))) in + N_Generic_Instantiation + and then Present (Library_Unit (Main_CU)) + then + Do_Unit_And_Dependents + (Library_Unit (Main_CU), + Unit (Library_Unit (Main_CU))); + end if; + + -- It's a spec, process it, and the units it depends on, + -- unless it is a descendent of the main unit. This can + -- happen when the body of a parent depends on some other + -- descendent. + + when others => + Par := Scope (Defining_Entity (Unit (CU))); + + if Is_Child_Unit (Defining_Entity (Unit (CU))) then + while Present (Par) + and then Par /= Standard_Standard + and then Par /= Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit) + loop + Par := Scope (Par); + end loop; + end if; + + if Par /= Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit) then + Do_Unit_And_Dependents (CU, N); + end if; + end case; + end; + + Next_Elmt (Cur); + end loop; + + -- Now process package bodies on which main depends, followed by bodies + -- of parents, if present, and finally main itself. + + if not Done (Main_Unit) then + Do_Main := True; + + Process_Main : declare + Parent_CU : Node_Id; + Body_CU : Node_Id; + Body_U : Unit_Number_Type; + Child : Entity_Id; + + function Is_Subunit_Of_Main (U : Node_Id) return Boolean; + -- If the main unit has subunits, their context may include + -- bodies that are needed in the body of main. We must examine + -- the context of the subunits, which are otherwise not made + -- explicit in the main unit. + + ------------------------ + -- Is_Subunit_Of_Main -- + ------------------------ + + function Is_Subunit_Of_Main (U : Node_Id) return Boolean is + Lib : Node_Id; + begin + if No (U) then + return False; + else + Lib := Library_Unit (U); + return Nkind (Unit (U)) = N_Subunit + and then + (Lib = Cunit (Main_Unit) + or else Is_Subunit_Of_Main (Lib)); + end if; + end Is_Subunit_Of_Main; + + -- Start of processing for Process_Main + + begin + Process_Bodies_In_Context (Main_CU); + + for Unit_Num in Done'Range loop + if Is_Subunit_Of_Main (Cunit (Unit_Num)) then + Process_Bodies_In_Context (Cunit (Unit_Num)); + end if; + end loop; + + -- If the main unit is a child unit, parent bodies may be present + -- because they export instances or inlined subprograms. Check for + -- presence of these, which are not present in context clauses. + -- Note that if the parents are instances, their bodies have been + -- processed before the main spec, because they may be needed + -- therein, so the following loop only affects non-instances. + + if Is_Child_Unit (Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit)) then + Child := Cunit_Entity (Main_Unit); + while Is_Child_Unit (Child) loop + Parent_CU := + Cunit (Get_Cunit_Entity_Unit_Number (Scope (Child))); + Body_CU := Library_Unit (Parent_CU); + + if Present (Body_CU) + and then not Seen (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Body_CU)) + and then not Depends_On_Main (Body_CU) + then + Body_U := Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Body_CU); + Seen (Body_U) := True; + Do_Action (Body_CU, Unit (Body_CU)); + Done (Body_U) := True; + end if; + + Child := Scope (Child); + end loop; + end if; + + Do_Action (Main_CU, Unit (Main_CU)); + Done (Main_Unit) := True; + end Process_Main; + end if; + + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + if Done /= (Done'Range => True) then + Write_Eol; + Write_Line ("Ignored units:"); + + Indent; + + for Unit_Num in Done'Range loop + if not Done (Unit_Num) then + Write_Unit_Info + (Unit_Num, Unit (Cunit (Unit_Num)), Withs => True); + end if; + end loop; + + Outdent; + end if; + end if; + + pragma Assert (Done (Main_Unit)); + + if Debug_Unit_Walk then + Outdent; + Write_Line ("end Walk_Library_Items."); + end if; + end Walk_Library_Items; + + ---------------- + -- Walk_Withs -- + ---------------- + + procedure Walk_Withs (CU : Node_Id; Include_Limited : Boolean) is + pragma Assert (Nkind (CU) = N_Compilation_Unit); + pragma Assert (Nkind (Unit (CU)) /= N_Subunit); + + procedure Walk_Immediate is new Walk_Withs_Immediate (Action); + + begin + -- First walk the withs immediately on the library item + + Walk_Immediate (CU, Include_Limited); + + -- For a body, we must also check for any subunits which belong to it + -- and which have context clauses of their own, since these with'ed + -- units are part of its own dependencies. + + if Nkind (Unit (CU)) in N_Unit_Body then + for S in Main_Unit .. Last_Unit loop + + -- We are only interested in subunits. For preproc. data and def. + -- files, Cunit is Empty, so we need to test that first. + + if Cunit (S) /= Empty + and then Nkind (Unit (Cunit (S))) = N_Subunit + then + declare + Pnode : Node_Id; + + begin + Pnode := Library_Unit (Cunit (S)); + + -- In -gnatc mode, the errors in the subunits will not have + -- been recorded, but the analysis of the subunit may have + -- failed, so just quit. + + if No (Pnode) then + exit; + end if; + + -- Find ultimate parent of the subunit + + while Nkind (Unit (Pnode)) = N_Subunit loop + Pnode := Library_Unit (Pnode); + end loop; + + -- See if it belongs to current unit, and if so, include its + -- with_clauses. Do not process main unit prematurely. + + if Pnode = CU and then CU /= Cunit (Main_Unit) then + Walk_Immediate (Cunit (S), Include_Limited); + end if; + end; + end if; + end loop; + end if; + end Walk_Withs; + + -------------------------- + -- Walk_Withs_Immediate -- + -------------------------- + + procedure Walk_Withs_Immediate (CU : Node_Id; Include_Limited : Boolean) is + pragma Assert (Nkind (CU) = N_Compilation_Unit); + + Context_Item : Node_Id; + Lib_Unit : Node_Id; + Body_CU : Node_Id; + + begin + Context_Item := First (Context_Items (CU)); + while Present (Context_Item) loop + if Nkind (Context_Item) = N_With_Clause + and then (Include_Limited + or else not Limited_Present (Context_Item)) + then + Lib_Unit := Library_Unit (Context_Item); + Action (Lib_Unit); + + -- If the context item indicates that a package body is needed + -- because of an instantiation in CU, traverse the body now, even + -- if CU is not related to the main unit. If the generic itself + -- appears in a package body, the context item is this body, and + -- it already appears in the traversal order, so we only need to + -- examine the case of a context item being a package declaration. + + if Present (Withed_Body (Context_Item)) + and then Nkind (Unit (Lib_Unit)) = N_Package_Declaration + and then Present (Corresponding_Body (Unit (Lib_Unit))) + then + Body_CU := + Parent + (Unit_Declaration_Node + (Corresponding_Body (Unit (Lib_Unit)))); + + -- A body may have an implicit with on its own spec, in which + -- case we must ignore this context item to prevent looping. + + if Unit (CU) /= Unit (Body_CU) then + Action (Body_CU); + end if; + end if; + end if; + + Context_Item := Next (Context_Item); + end loop; + end Walk_Withs_Immediate; + + --------------------- + -- Write_Unit_Info -- + --------------------- + + procedure Write_Unit_Info + (Unit_Num : Unit_Number_Type; + Item : Node_Id; + Prefix : String := ""; + Withs : Boolean := False) + is + begin + Write_Str (Prefix); + Write_Unit_Name (Unit_Name (Unit_Num)); + Write_Str (", unit "); + Write_Int (Int (Unit_Num)); + Write_Str (", "); + Write_Int (Int (Item)); + Write_Str ("="); + Write_Str (Node_Kind'Image (Nkind (Item))); + + if Item /= Original_Node (Item) then + Write_Str (", orig = "); + Write_Int (Int (Original_Node (Item))); + Write_Str ("="); + Write_Str (Node_Kind'Image (Nkind (Original_Node (Item)))); + end if; + + Write_Eol; + + -- Skip the rest if we're not supposed to print the withs + + if not Withs then + return; + end if; + + declare + Context_Item : Node_Id; + + begin + Context_Item := First (Context_Items (Cunit (Unit_Num))); + while Present (Context_Item) + and then (Nkind (Context_Item) /= N_With_Clause + or else Limited_Present (Context_Item)) + loop + Context_Item := Next (Context_Item); + end loop; + + if Present (Context_Item) then + Indent; + Write_Line ("withs:"); + Indent; + + while Present (Context_Item) loop + if Nkind (Context_Item) = N_With_Clause + and then not Limited_Present (Context_Item) + then + pragma Assert (Present (Library_Unit (Context_Item))); + Write_Unit_Name + (Unit_Name + (Get_Cunit_Unit_Number (Library_Unit (Context_Item)))); + + if Implicit_With (Context_Item) then + Write_Str (" -- implicit"); + end if; + + Write_Eol; + end if; + + Context_Item := Next (Context_Item); + end loop; + + Outdent; + Write_Line ("end withs"); + Outdent; + end if; + end; + end Write_Unit_Info; + +end Sem; |