obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e8798cc59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/* Simple check that sibling calls are performed from a
+   void non-leaf-function taking one int argument calling a function which
+   is about the same as itself.
+
+   Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation Inc.
+   Contributed by Hans-Peter Nilsson  <hp@bitrange.com>  */
+
+/* { dg-do run { xfail { { arc-*-* avr-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* h8300-*-* hppa*64*-*-* m32r-*-* m68hc1?-*-* mcore-*-* mn10300-*-* xstormy16-*-* v850*-*-* vax-*-* xtensa*-*-* } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm32 } } } } } */
+/* -mlongcall disables sibcall patterns.  */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mlongcall" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -foptimize-sibling-calls" } */
+
+/* The option -foptimize-sibling-calls is the default, but serves as
+   marker.  This test is xfailed on targets without sibcall patterns
+   (except targets where the test does not work due to the return address
+   not saved on the regular stack).  */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+extern void exit (int);
+
+/* Sibcalls are not supported in MIPS16 mode, which has direct calls but
+   not direct jumps.  */
+#ifdef __mips
+#define ATTR __attribute__((nomips16))
+#else
+#define ATTR
+#endif
+
+static ATTR void recurser_void1 (int);
+static ATTR void recurser_void2 (int);
+extern void track (int);
+
+int main ()
+{
+  recurser_void1 (0);
+  exit (0);
+}
+
+/* The functions should get the same stack-frame, and best way to make it
+   reasonably sure is to make them have the same contents (regarding the
+   n tests).  */
+
+static void __attribute__((noinline)) ATTR
+recurser_void1 (int n)
+{
+  if (n == 0 || n == 7 || n == 8)
+    track (n);
+
+  if (n == 10)
+    return;
+
+  recurser_void2 (n + 1);
+}
+
+static void __attribute__((noinline)) ATTR
+recurser_void2 (int n)
+{
+  if (n == 0 || n == 7 || n == 8)
+    track (n);
+
+  if (n == 10)
+    return;
+
+  recurser_void1 (n + 1);
+}
+
+void *trackpoint;
+
+void __attribute__ ((noinline))
+track (int n)
+{
+  char stackpos[1];
+
+  if (n == 0)
+    trackpoint = stackpos;
+  else if ((n != 7 && n != 8) || trackpoint != stackpos)
+    abort ();
+}