diff options
author | upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org> | 2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org> | 2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400 |
commit | 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd (patch) | |
tree | 976dc5ab7fddf506dadce60ae936f43f58787092 /gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_34.f90 | |
download | cbb-gcc-4.6.4-554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd.tar.bz2 cbb-gcc-4.6.4-554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd.tar.xz |
obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream
verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.
downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.
if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_34.f90')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_34.f90 | 33 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_34.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_34.f90 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..880f179e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_34.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! +! PR fortran/47042 +! +! Contribued by Jerry DeLisle +! + +program bug + +contains +function get_cstring () + character :: get_cstring + character, pointer :: ptmp + character, allocatable :: atmp + + get_cstring = ptmp(i) ! { dg-error "must have an explicit function interface" } + get_cstring = atmp(i) ! { dg-error "must have an explicit function interface" } +end function + +function get_cstring2 () + EXTERNAL :: ptmp, atmp + character :: get_cstring2 + character, pointer :: ptmp + character, allocatable :: atmp + + get_cstring2 = atmp(i) ! { dg-error "must have an explicit function interface" } + + ! The following is regarded as call to a procedure pointer, + ! which is in principle valid: + get_cstring2 = ptmp(i) +end function + +end program |