summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f9017
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..592282fb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-require-effective-target vect_float }
+
+! Peeling to align the store to Y will also align the load from Y.
+! The load from X may still be misaligned.
+
+SUBROUTINE SAXPY(X, Y, A)
+DIMENSION X(64), Y(64)
+Y = Y + A * X
+END
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { { vect_no_align } || {! vector_alignment_reachable} } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1 "vect" { xfail { { vect_no_align } || {! vector_alignment_reachable} } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 2 "vect" { target { {! vector_alignment_reachable} && {! vect_hw_misalign} } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "accesses have the same alignment." 1 "vect" } }
+! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } }