From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400
Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified
 gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream
 tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/inline1.C | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/inline1.C

(limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/inline1.C')

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/inline1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/inline1.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7e5f062e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/inline1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O" }
+// Make sure inlined non-outlined functions aren't marked weak.
+// We'd get a ".weak xyzzy" annotation trigged by the second declaration.
+
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "weak\[^ \t\]*\[ \t\]_?xyzzy" } } 
+
+// The next check isn't really part of the actual test, just to make
+// sure there's no outline-copy of xyzzy, because if that really
+// happened, it *should* be marked linkonce or perhaps weak.
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "xyzzy" } } 
+
+extern int x;
+extern void foo(void);
+extern void bar(void);
+
+extern "C" inline int xyzzy(int a)
+{
+  foo();
+  return a + x;
+}
+
+extern "C" int xyzzy(int);
+
+extern inline int plugh(int c)
+{
+  return xyzzy (c);
+}
+
+int y;
+void doit(int b)
+{
+  y = xyzzy (b) + plugh (b);
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3