From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400
Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified
 gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream
 tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900221_01.C | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900221_01.C

(limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900221_01.C')

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900221_01.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900221_01.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7a31fbb96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900221_01.C
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// { dg-do assemble  }
+// g++ 1.36.1 bug 900221_01
+
+// Ref: 3.2
+//
+// Section 3.2 of the C++ 2.0 Reference Manual says:
+//
+//	"Names of formal arguments for a function are treated as if they
+//	were declared in the outermost block of that function"
+//
+// g++ does not enforce this treatment.
+
+// Cfront 2.0 passes this test.
+
+// keywords: scope, formal parameters
+
+void function (int arg1)
+{
+  int arg1;		// { dg-error "" } redeclaration of arg1
+}
+
+int main () { return 0; }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3