From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: upstream source tree Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400 Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository. --- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900511_02.C | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900511_02.C (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900511_02.C') diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900511_02.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900511_02.C new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f2f565084 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900511_02.C @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +// { dg-do assemble } +// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900511_02 + +// g++ does not properly shadow names of types with names of data members +// in cases where the type names in question are used in the context of +// formal parameters lists for member functions. + +// keywords: typedef names, shadowing, scope, formal parameter list + +// cfront 2.0 passes this test. + +enum enum0 { enum0_value_0 }; + +struct struct0 { + int enum0; + void member_function (enum0 e); // { dg-error "" } invalid use of struct-local member +}; + +void class0::member_function (enum0 e) { // { dg-error "" } syntax error +} + +int main () { return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3