From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: upstream source tree Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400 Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository. --- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C') diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C new file mode 100644 index 000000000..867436a65 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +// Some targets (e.g. those with "set_board_info needs_status_wrapper 1" +// in their dejagnu baseboard description) require that the status is +// final when exit is entered (or main returns), and not "overruled" by a +// destructor calling _exit. It's not really worth it to handle that. +// { dg-do run { target unwrapped } } + +// Bug: g++ was failing to destroy C::a because it was using two +// different sentry variables for construction and destruction. + +extern "C" void _exit (int); + +int r = 1; + +struct A +{ + void f(){} + A(){ ++r; } + ~A(){ r -= 2; _exit (r); } +}; + +template +struct C +{ + C(){ a.f(); } + static A a; +}; + +template A C::a; +typedef C B; + +int main() +{ + C c; + return r; +} -- cgit v1.2.3