From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: upstream source tree Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400 Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository. --- .../gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90') diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5b0d28a0d --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +! { dg-do run } +! Tests the fix for pr28914, in which array constructors using the loop +! variable within a do loop for the implied do loop of the constructor +! would result in a corrupted do loop counter. +! +! Based on the testscase by Ed Korkven +! +program pr28914 + implicit none + integer n, i + parameter (n = 66000) ! Problem manifests for n > 65535 + double precision a(n), summation + + summation = 0.0 + do i = 1, 1 + a = (/ (i, i = 1, n) /) ! This is legal and was broken + a = sqrt(a) + summation = SUM(a) + enddo + summation = abs(summation - 11303932.9138271_8) + + if (summation.gt.0.00001) call abort() +end program pr28914 + + -- cgit v1.2.3