From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: upstream source tree Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400 Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository. --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_assign_2.f90 | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_assign_2.f90 (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_assign_2.f90') diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_assign_2.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_assign_2.f90 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e308375ef --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_assign_2.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +! { dg-do run } +! Test the fix for PR40551 in which the assignment +! was not dealing correctly with non-contiguous lhs +! references; eg. a(1,:) +! +! Reported by by Maciej Zwierzycki +! at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-06/msg00254.html +! and by Tobias Burnus on Bugzilla +! +integer :: a(2,2) +a = -42 +a(1,:) = func() +if (any (reshape (a, [4]) /= [1, -42, 2, -42])) call abort +a = -42 +a(2,:) = func() +if (any (reshape (a, [4]) /= [-42, 1, -42, 2])) call abort +a = -42 +a(:,1) = func() +if (any (reshape (a, [4]) /= [1, 2, -42, -42])) call abort +a = -42 +a(:,2) = func() +if (any (reshape (a, [4]) /= [-42, -42, 1, 2])) call abort +contains + function func() + integer :: func(2) + call sub(func) + end function func + subroutine sub(a) + integer :: a(2) + a = [1,2] + end subroutine +end + -- cgit v1.2.3