From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: upstream source tree Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400 Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository. --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f') diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dbf9f0d05 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +c { dg-do run } +c { dg-options "-fno-bounds-check" } +CCC g77 0.5.21 `Actual Bugs': +CCC * A code-generation bug afflicts Intel x86 targets when `-O2' is +CCC specified compiling, for example, an old version of the `DNRM2' +CCC routine. The x87 coprocessor stack is being somewhat mismanaged +CCC in cases where assigned `GOTO' and `ASSIGN' are involved. +CCC +CCC Version 0.5.21 of `g77' contains an initial effort to fix the +CCC problem, but this effort is incomplete, and a more complete fix is +CCC planned for the next release. + +C Currently this test fails with (at least) `-O2 -funroll-loops' on +C i586-unknown-linux-gnulibc1. + +C (This is actually an obsolete version of dnrm2 -- consult the +c current Netlib BLAS.) + + integer i + double precision a(1:100), dnrm2 + do i=1,100 + a(i)=0.D0 + enddo + if (dnrm2(100,a,1) .ne. 0.0) call abort + end + + double precision function dnrm2 ( n, dx, incx) + integer i, incx, ix, j, n, next + double precision dx(1), cutlo, cuthi, hitest, sum, xmax,zero,one + data zero, one /0.0d0, 1.0d0/ + data cutlo, cuthi / 8.232d-11, 1.304d19 / + j = 0 + if(n .gt. 0 .and. incx.gt.0) go to 10 + dnrm2 = zero + go to 300 + 10 assign 30 to next ! { dg-warning "ASSIGN" "" } + sum = zero + i = 1 + ix = 1 + 20 go to next,(30, 50, 70, 110) ! { dg-warning "Assigned GOTO" "" } + 30 if( dabs(dx(i)) .gt. cutlo) go to 85 + assign 50 to next ! { dg-warning "ASSIGN" "" } + xmax = zero + 50 if( dx(i) .eq. zero) go to 200 + if( dabs(dx(i)) .gt. cutlo) go to 85 + assign 70 to next ! { dg-warning "ASSIGN" "" } + go to 105 + 100 continue + ix = j + assign 110 to next ! { dg-warning "ASSIGN" "" } + sum = (sum / dx(i)) / dx(i) + 105 xmax = dabs(dx(i)) + go to 115 + 70 if( dabs(dx(i)) .gt. cutlo ) go to 75 + 110 if( dabs(dx(i)) .le. xmax ) go to 115 + sum = one + sum * (xmax / dx(i))**2 + xmax = dabs(dx(i)) + go to 200 + 115 sum = sum + (dx(i)/xmax)**2 + go to 200 + 75 sum = (sum * xmax) * xmax + 85 hitest = cuthi/float( n ) + do 95 j = ix,n + if(dabs(dx(i)) .ge. hitest) go to 100 + sum = sum + dx(i)**2 + i = i + incx + 95 continue + dnrm2 = dsqrt( sum ) + go to 300 + 200 continue + ix = ix + 1 + i = i + incx + if( ix .le. n ) go to 20 + dnrm2 = xmax * dsqrt(sum) + 300 continue + end -- cgit v1.2.3