From 554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: upstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:14:05 -0400
Subject: obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website; verified
 gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream
 tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.
---
 .../testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java  | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java

(limited to 'libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java')

diff --git a/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java b/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..17370b537
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/* This test checks for two slightly different overflow scenarios in
+ * array allocation.
+ *
+ * The first is that the number of bytes needed for an array size
+ * overflows on a 32 bit machine.
+ *
+ * The second is that on a 64 machine, the number of bytes silently
+ * gets truncated, resulting in too small an object being
+ * allocated.  */
+
+class newarray_overflow
+{
+  static boolean failed = false;
+
+  static void int_check()
+  {
+    int[] x;
+    try
+      {
+	x = new int [1 << 30];
+      }
+    catch (OutOfMemoryError e)
+      {
+	return;
+      }
+    /* If we really get away with it (64 bit machine), that's cool.  */
+    if (x == null) {
+      System.err.println ("int check: new returned null.");
+      failed = true;
+      return;
+    }
+    try
+      {
+	// Only check a few places so we don't thrash too badly.
+	for (int i = 0; i < x.length; i += (1 << 24))
+	  if (x[i] != 0)
+	    failed = true;
+      }
+    catch (Throwable e)
+      {
+	System.err.print ("int check: ");
+	System.err.println (e);
+	failed = true;
+      }
+  }
+
+  static void object_check()
+  {
+    Object[] x;
+    try
+      {
+	x = new Object [1 << 30];
+	System.err.println ("Alloc succeeded.");
+	System.err.println (x);
+      }
+    catch (OutOfMemoryError e)
+      {
+	return;
+      }
+    /* If we really get away with it (64 bit machine), that's cool.  */
+    if (x == null) {
+      System.err.println ("Object check: new returned null.");
+      failed = true;
+      return;
+    }
+    try
+      {
+	for (int i = 0; i < x.length; i += (1 << 24))
+	  if (x[i] != null)
+	    failed = true;
+      }
+    catch (Throwable e)
+      {
+	System.err.print ("Object check: ");
+	System.err.println (e);
+	failed = true;
+      }
+  }
+
+  public static void main (String[] ignore)
+  {
+    int_check();
+    object_check();
+
+    if (!failed)
+      System.out.println ("ok");
+  }
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3