obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 328 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxa/cxa5a02.a b/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxa/cxa5a02.a
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9e6c575dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxa/cxa5a02.a
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+-- CXA5A02.A
+--
+--                             Grant of Unlimited Rights
+--
+--     Under contracts F33600-87-D-0337, F33600-84-D-0280, MDA903-79-C-0687,
+--     F08630-91-C-0015, and DCA100-97-D-0025, the U.S. Government obtained 
+--     unlimited rights in the software and documentation contained herein.
+--     Unlimited rights are defined in DFAR 252.227-7013(a)(19).  By making 
+--     this public release, the Government intends to confer upon all 
+--     recipients unlimited rights  equal to those held by the Government.  
+--     These rights include rights to use, duplicate, release or disclose the 
+--     released technical data and computer software in whole or in part, in 
+--     any manner and for any purpose whatsoever, and to have or permit others 
+--     to do so.
+--
+--                                    DISCLAIMER
+--
+--     ALL MATERIALS OR INFORMATION HEREIN RELEASED, MADE AVAILABLE OR
+--     DISCLOSED ARE AS IS.  THE GOVERNMENT MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED 
+--     WARRANTY AS TO ANY MATTER WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING THE CONDITIONS OF THE
+--     SOFTWARE, DOCUMENTATION OR OTHER INFORMATION RELEASED, MADE AVAILABLE 
+--     OR DISCLOSED, OR THE OWNERSHIP, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A
+--     PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF SAID MATERIAL.
+--*
+--
+-- OBJECTIVE:
+--      Check that the functions Cos and Cosh provide correct results.
+--
+-- TEST DESCRIPTION:
+--      This test examines both the version of Cos and Cosh resulting from
+--      the instantiation of the Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions
+--      with type derived from type Float, as well as the pre-instantiated 
+--      version of this package for type Float.
+--      Prescribed results, including instances prescribed to raise 
+--      exceptions, are examined in the test cases.  In addition, 
+--      certain evaluations are performed where the actual function result 
+--      is compared with the expected result (within an epsilon range of 
+--      accuracy).
+--
+-- TEST FILES:
+--      The following files comprise this test:
+--
+--         FXA5A00.A   (foundation code)
+--         CXA5A02.A
+--
+--
+-- CHANGE HISTORY:
+--      09 Mar 95   SAIC    Initial prerelease version.
+--      03 Apr 95   SAIC    Removed reference to derived type.
+--      13 Jun 95   SAIC    Incorporated use of Dont_Optimize procedure, and
+--                          use of Result_Within_Range function overloaded for
+--                          FXA5A00.New_Float_Type.
+--      28 Feb 97   PWB.CTA Removed checks specifying Cycle => 2.0 * Pi
+--      26 Jun 98   EDS     Protected exception checks by first testing
+--                          for 'Machine_Overflows.  Removed code deleted
+--                          by comment.
+-- CHANGE NOTE:
+--      According to Ken Dritz, author of the Numerics Annex of the RM,
+--      one should never specify the cycle 2.0*Pi for the trigonometric
+--      functions.  In particular, if the machine number for the first
+--      argument is not an exact multiple of the machine number for the
+--      explicit cycle, then the specified exact results cannot be
+--      reasonably expected.  The affected checks have been deleted.
+--!
+
+with Ada.Numerics.Elementary_Functions;
+with Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions;
+with FXA5A00;
+with Report;
+
+procedure CXA5A02 is
+begin
+
+   Report.Test ("CXA5A02", "Check that the functions Cos and Cosh provide " &
+                           "correct results");
+
+   Test_Block:
+   declare
+
+      use Ada.Numerics;
+      use FXA5A00;
+
+      package GEF is new Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions(New_Float);
+      package  EF renames Ada.Numerics.Elementary_Functions;
+
+      The_Result       : Float;
+      New_Float_Result : New_Float;
+
+      procedure Dont_Optimize_Float     is new Dont_Optimize(Float);
+      procedure Dont_Optimize_New_Float is new Dont_Optimize(New_Float);
+
+   begin
+
+      -- Testing of Cos Function, both instantiated and pre-instantiated
+      -- version.
+
+      -- Check that no exception occurs on computing the Cos with very
+      -- large (positive and negative) input values.
+
+      begin 
+         New_Float_Result := GEF.Cos (New_Float(FXA5A00.Large));
+         Dont_Optimize_New_Float(New_Float_Result, 1);
+      exception
+         when others =>
+           Report.Failed("Unexpected exception on GEF.Cos with large " &
+                         "positive value");
+      end;
+
+      begin 
+         The_Result := EF.Cos (FXA5A00.Minus_Large);
+         Dont_Optimize_Float(The_Result, 2);
+      exception
+         when others =>
+           Report.Failed("Unexpected exception on GEF.Cos with large " &
+                         "negative value");
+      end;
+
+
+      -- Test of Cos for prescribed result at zero.
+
+      if GEF.Cos (0.0) /= 1.0 or
+          EF.Cos (0.0) /= 1.0
+      then
+         Report.Failed("Incorrect value returned from Cos(0.0)");
+      end if;
+
+
+      -- Test of Cos with expected result value between 1.0 and -1.0.
+
+      if not (Result_Within_Range( EF.Cos(Ada.Numerics.Pi/3.0),
+                                          0.500, 
+                                          0.001)                       and
+              Result_Within_Range(GEF.Cos(0.6166), 0.816, 0.001)       and
+              Result_Within_Range(GEF.Cos(0.1949), 0.981, 0.001)       and
+              Result_Within_Range( EF.Cos(Ada.Numerics.Pi/2.0),
+                                          0.00,
+                                          0.001)                       and
+              Result_Within_Range( EF.Cos(2.0*Ada.Numerics.Pi/3.0),
+                                          -0.500,
+                                          0.001)                       and
+              Result_Within_Range(GEF.Cos(New_Float(Ada.Numerics.Pi)),
+                                          -1.00,
+                                           0.001))
+      then
+         Report.Failed("Incorrect value returned from Cos function when " &
+                       "the expected result is between 1.0 and -1.0");
+      end if;
+
+
+      -- Testing of the Cos function with Cycle parameter.
+
+      -- Check that Argument_Error is raised when the value of the Cycle
+      -- parameter is zero.
+
+      begin 
+         New_Float_Result := GEF.Cos (X => 1.0, Cycle => 0.0);
+         Report.Failed("Argument_Error not raised by GEF.Cos function " &
+                       "when the Cycle parameter is zero");
+         Dont_Optimize_New_Float(New_Float_Result, 3);
+      exception
+         when Ada.Numerics.Argument_Error => null;  -- OK, expected exception.
+         when others =>
+            Report.Failed("Unexpected exception raised by GEF.cos function " &
+                          "when the Cycle parameter is zero");
+      end;
+
+      begin 
+         The_Result := EF.Cos (X => 0.55, Cycle => 0.0);
+         Report.Failed("Argument_Error not raised by EF.Cos function when " &
+                       "the Cycle parameter is zero");
+         Dont_Optimize_Float(The_Result, 4);
+      exception
+         when Ada.Numerics.Argument_Error => null;  -- OK, expected exception.
+         when others =>
+            Report.Failed("Unexpected exception raised by EF.Cos function " &
+                          "when the Cycle parameter is zero");
+      end;
+
+      -- Check that Argument_Error is raised when the value of the Cycle
+      -- parameter is negative.
+
+      begin 
+         New_Float_Result := GEF.Cos (X => 0.45, Cycle => -2.0*Pi);
+         Report.Failed("Argument_Error not raised by GEF.Cos function " &
+                       "when the Cycle parameter is negative");
+         Dont_Optimize_New_Float(New_Float_Result, 5);
+      exception
+         when Ada.Numerics.Argument_Error => null;  -- OK, expected exception.
+         when others =>
+            Report.Failed("Unexpected exception raised by GEF.Cos function " &
+                          "when the Cycle parameter is negative");
+      end;
+
+      begin 
+         The_Result := EF.Cos (X => 0.10, Cycle => -Pi/2.0);
+         Report.Failed("Argument_Error not raised by EF.Cos function when " &
+                       "the Cycle parameter is negative");
+         Dont_Optimize_Float(The_Result, 6);
+      exception
+         when Ada.Numerics.Argument_Error => null;  -- OK, expected exception.
+         when others =>
+            Report.Failed("Unexpected exception raised by EF.Cos function " &
+                          "when the Cycle parameter is negative");
+      end;
+
+      -- Test of Cos with Cycle parameter for prescribed result at zero.
+
+      if GEF.Cos (0.0, 360.0) /= 1.0 or
+          EF.Cos (0.0, 360.0) /= 1.0
+      then
+         Report.Failed("Incorrect value returned from Cos function with " &
+                       "cycle parameter for a zero input parameter value");
+      end if;
+
+
+      -- Tests of Cos function with specified Cycle, using various input
+      -- parameter values for prescribed results.
+
+      if GEF.Cos(0.0,   360.0) /=  1.0 or 
+          EF.Cos(360.0, 360.0) /=  1.0 or 
+         GEF.Cos(90.0,  360.0) /=  0.0 or 
+          EF.Cos(270.0, 360.0) /=  0.0 or 
+         GEF.Cos(180.0, 360.0) /= -1.0 or 
+          EF.Cos(540.0, 360.0) /= -1.0    
+      then
+         Report.Failed("Incorrect result from the Cos function with " &
+                       "specified cycle for prescribed results");
+      end if;
+
+
+
+      -- Testing of Cosh Function, both instantiated and pre-instantiated
+      -- version.
+
+      -- Test for Constraint_Error on parameter with large positive magnitude.
+
+      begin
+
+         if New_Float'Machine_Overflows then
+
+            New_Float_Result := GEF.Cosh (New_Float(FXA5A00.Large));
+            Report.Failed("Constraint_Error not raised when the GEF.Cosh " &
+                          "function is provided a parameter with a large " &
+                          "positive value");
+            Dont_Optimize_New_Float(New_Float_Result, 9);
+         end if;
+
+      exception
+         when Constraint_Error => null;  -- OK, expected exception.
+         when others           =>
+            Report.Failed("Constraint_Error not raised when the GEF.Cosh " &
+                          "function is provided a parameter with a large " &
+                          "positive value");
+      end;
+
+      -- Test for Constraint_Error on parameter with large negative magnitude.
+
+      begin
+
+         if Float'Machine_Overflows then
+            The_Result := EF.Cosh (FXA5A00.Minus_Large);
+            Report.Failed("Constraint_Error not raised when the EF.Cosh " &
+                          "function is provided a parameter with a "      &
+                          "large negative value");
+            Dont_Optimize_Float(The_Result, 10);
+         end if;
+
+      exception
+         when Constraint_Error => null;  -- OK, expected exception.
+         when others           =>
+            Report.Failed("Constraint_Error not raised when the EF.Cosh " &
+                          "function is provided a parameter with a "      &
+                          "large negative value");
+      end;
+
+
+      -- Test that no exception occurs when the Cosh function is provided a
+      -- very small positive or negative value.
+
+      begin 
+         New_Float_Result := GEF.Cosh (New_Float(FXA5A00.Small));
+         Dont_Optimize_New_Float(New_Float_Result, 11);
+      exception
+         when others =>
+            Report.Failed("Unexpected exception on GEF.Cosh with a very" &
+                          "small positive value");
+      end;
+
+      begin 
+         The_Result := EF.Cosh (-FXA5A00.Small);
+         Dont_Optimize_Float(The_Result, 12);
+      exception
+         when others =>
+            Report.Failed("Unexpected exception on EF.Cosh with a very" &
+                          "small negative value");
+      end;
+
+
+      -- Test for prescribed 1.0 result of Function Cosh with 0.0 parameter.
+
+      if GEF.Cosh (0.0) /= 1.0 or
+          EF.Cosh (0.0) /= 1.0
+      then
+         Report.Failed("Incorrect value returned from Cosh(0.0)");
+      end if;
+
+
+      -- Test of Cosh function with various input parameters.
+
+      if not FXA5A00.Result_Within_Range(GEF.Cosh(0.24), 1.029, 0.001) or
+         not FXA5A00.Result_Within_Range( EF.Cosh(0.59), 1.179, 0.001) or
+         not FXA5A00.Result_Within_Range(GEF.Cosh(1.06), 1.616, 0.001) or
+         not FXA5A00.Result_Within_Range( EF.Cosh(1.50), 2.352, 0.001) or
+         not FXA5A00.Result_Within_Range(GEF.Cosh(1.84), 3.228, 0.001) or
+         not FXA5A00.Result_Within_Range( EF.Cosh(3.40), 14.99, 0.01) 
+      then
+         Report.Failed("Incorrect result from Cosh function with " &
+                       "various input parameters");
+      end if;
+
+
+   exception
+      when others => Report.Failed ("Exception raised in Test_Block");
+   end Test_Block;
+
+   Report.Result;
+
+end CXA5A02;