obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 258 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/namespace1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/namespace1.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6629efb9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/namespace1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+/* Test DWARF namespace support. 
+   This test case is based on GDB testsuite test case.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+namespace AAA {
+  char c;
+  int i;
+  int A_xyzq (int);
+  char xyzq (char);
+  class inA {
+  public:
+    int xx;
+    int fum (int);
+  };
+};
+
+int AAA::inA::fum (int i)
+{
+  return 10 + i;
+}
+
+namespace BBB {
+  char c;
+  int i;
+  int B_xyzq (int);
+  char xyzq (char);
+
+  namespace CCC {
+    char xyzq (char);
+  };
+
+  class Klasse {
+  public:
+    char xyzq (char);
+    int dummy;
+  };
+};
+
+int AAA::A_xyzq (int x)
+{
+  return 2 * x;
+}
+
+char AAA::xyzq (char c)
+{
+  return 'a';
+}
+
+
+int BBB::B_xyzq (int x)
+{
+  return 3 * x;
+}
+
+char BBB::xyzq (char c)
+{
+  return 'b';
+}
+
+char BBB::CCC::xyzq (char c)
+{
+  return 'z';
+}
+
+char BBB::Klasse::xyzq (char c)
+{
+  return 'o';
+}
+
+void marker1(void)
+{
+  return;
+}
+
+namespace
+{
+  int X = 9;
+
+  namespace G
+  {
+    int Xg = 10;
+
+    namespace
+    {
+      int XgX = 11;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+namespace H
+{
+  int h = 14;
+}
+
+namespace I = H;
+
+namespace J
+{
+  int j = 15;
+}
+
+using namespace J;
+
+namespace K
+{
+  int k = 16;
+}
+
+namespace L
+{
+  using namespace K;
+}
+
+namespace O
+{
+  int o = 18;
+}
+
+namespace P
+{
+  using namespace O;
+}
+
+namespace Q
+{
+  using namespace P;
+}
+
+namespace R
+{
+  int r1 = 19;
+  int r2 = 20;
+}
+
+using R::r1;
+
+namespace C
+{
+  int c = 1;
+  int shadow = 12;
+
+  class CClass {
+  public:
+    int x;
+    class NestedClass {
+    public:
+      int y;
+    };
+  };
+
+  namespace
+  {
+    int cX = 6;
+    
+    namespace F
+    {
+      int cXf = 7;
+
+      namespace
+      {
+	int cXfX = 8;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  namespace C
+  {
+    int cc = 2;
+  }
+
+  namespace E
+  {
+    int ce = 4;
+  }
+
+  namespace D
+  {
+    int cd = 3;
+    int shadow = 13;
+
+    namespace E
+    {
+      int cde = 5;
+    }
+
+    namespace M
+    {
+      int cdm = 17;
+    }
+
+    using namespace M;
+
+    void marker2 (void)
+    {
+      // NOTE: carlton/2003-04-23: I'm listing the expressions that I
+      // plan to have GDB try to print out, just to make sure that the
+      // compiler and I agree which ones should be legal!  It's easy
+      // to screw up when testing the boundaries of namespace stuff.
+      c;
+      //cc;
+      C::cc;
+      cd;
+      //C::D::cd;
+      E::cde;
+      shadow;
+      //E::ce;
+      cX;
+      F::cXf;
+      F::cXfX;
+      X;
+      G::Xg;
+      //cXOtherFile;
+      //XOtherFile;
+      G::XgX;
+      I::h;
+      j;
+      L::k;
+      //k;
+      cdm;
+      Q::o;
+      //o;
+      r1;
+      //r2;
+
+      return;
+    }
+
+  }
+}
+
+int main ()
+{
+  using AAA::inA;
+  char c1;
+
+  using namespace BBB;
+  
+  c1 = xyzq ('x');
+  c1 = AAA::xyzq ('x');
+  c1 = BBB::CCC::xyzq ('m');
+  
+  inA ina;
+
+  ina.xx = 33;
+
+  int y;
+
+  y = AAA::A_xyzq (33);
+  y += B_xyzq (44);
+
+  BBB::Klasse cl;
+
+  c1 = cl.xyzq('e');
+
+  marker1();
+  
+  C::D::marker2 ();
+}