obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/nest19.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/nest19.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..01ae3d002
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/nest19.C
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// { dg-do assemble  }
+// GROUPS passed nested-classes
+// This is the first line of file ||t3.C||.
+
+// This code demonstrates a variation of the same problem with nested
+// types.  In C++, nested typedefs are not supposed to be visible
+// outside their class scopes but they apparently are in gcc 2.4.5.
+// This code compiles fine in AT&T cfront 3.0.1, but gcc rejects it
+// with the messages given below.
+
+// If this class does not precede Expr, then the code will compile.
+
+class Another {
+public:
+    typedef int Boolean;
+    enum { FALSE, TRUE };
+};
+
+// If Expr does not define typedef int Boolean, then the code will
+// compile.
+
+class Expr {
+public:
+    typedef int Boolean;
+    enum { FALSE, TRUE };
+    void foo();
+    void call_something_with(Boolean);
+};
+
+// t3.C: In method `void  Expr::foo ()':
+//   t3.C:36: uninitialized const `Boolean'
+//   t3.C:36: parse error before `='
+//   t3.C:37: `argument' undeclared (first use this function)
+//   t3.C:37: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
+//   t3.C:37: for each function it appears in.)
+
+void Expr::foo() {
+    const Boolean argument = TRUE;
+    call_something_with(argument);
+}