obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/typename2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/typename2.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..86512c983
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/typename2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// { dg-do assemble  }
+// { dg-options "" }
+
+// Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation
+
+// by Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
+// based on bug report by Nick Rasmussen <nick@jive.org>
+
+// This is slightly different from typename1.C.  This one tests
+// whether the implicit typename extension works.  gcc 2.95 reports:
+
+// warning: lookup of `foo' finds `struct foo'
+// warning:   instead of `baz<T>::foo' from dependent base class
+// warning:   (use `typename baz::foo' if that's what you meant)
+
+// But baz<T>::foo is not a base class, and `foo' should have been
+// found in baz's scope.
+
+struct foo;
+
+template <class T> struct bar {
+  typedef int foo;
+};
+
+template <class T> struct baz {
+  typedef bar<T>::foo foo; // { dg-error "" } implicit typename
+  void m(foo); 
+};