obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 184 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/ms_c90-printf-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/ms_c90-printf-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f99d4c49d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/ms_c90-printf-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+/* Test for printf formats.  Formats using C90 features, including cases
+   where C90 specifies some aspect of the format to be ignored or where
+   the behavior is undefined.
+*/
+/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { *-*-mingw* } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1990 -pedantic -Wformat" } */
+
+#define USE_SYSTEM_FORMATS
+#include "format.h"
+
+void
+foo (int i, int i1, int i2, unsigned int u, double d, char *s, void *p,
+     int *n, short int *hn, long int l, unsigned long int ul,
+     long int *ln, long double ld, wint_t lc, wchar_t *ls, llong ll,
+     ullong ull, unsigned int *un, const int *cn, signed char *ss,
+     unsigned char *us, const signed char *css, unsigned int u1,
+     unsigned int u2)
+{
+  /* See ISO/IEC 9899:1990 (E) subclause 7.9.6.1 (pages 131-134).  */
+  /* Basic sanity checks for the different components of a format.  */
+  printf ("%d\n", i);
+  printf ("%+d\n", i);
+  printf ("%3d\n", i);
+  printf ("%-3d\n", i);
+  printf ("%*d\n", i1, i);
+  printf ("%d %lu\n", i, ul);
+  /* Bogus use of width.  */
+  printf ("%5n\n", n); /* { dg-warning "width" "width with %n" } */
+  /* Valid and invalid %% constructions.  Some of the warning messages
+     are non-optimal, but they do detect the errorneous nature of the
+     format string.
+  */
+  printf ("%%");
+  printf ("%-%"); /* { dg-warning "format" "bogus %%" } */
+  printf ("%-%\n"); /* { dg-warning "format" "bogus %%" } */
+  printf ("%5%\n"); /* { dg-warning "format" "bogus %%" } */
+  printf ("%h%\n"); /* { dg-warning "format" "bogus %%" } */
+  /* Valid and invalid %h, %l, %L constructions.  */
+  printf ("%hd", i);
+  printf ("%hi", i);
+  /* Strictly, these parameters should be int or unsigned int according to
+     what unsigned short promotes to.  However, GCC ignores sign
+     differences in format checking here, and this is relied on to get the
+     correct checking without print_char_table needing to know whether
+     int and short are the same size.
+  */
+  printf ("%ho%hu%hx%hX", u, u, u, u);
+  printf ("%hn", hn);
+  printf ("%hf", d); /* { dg-warning "length" "bad use of %h" } */
+  printf ("%he", d); /* { dg-warning "length" "bad use of %h" } */
+  printf ("%hE", d); /* { dg-warning "length" "bad use of %h" } */
+  printf ("%hg", d); /* { dg-warning "length" "bad use of %h" } */
+  printf ("%hG", d); /* { dg-warning "length" "bad use of %h" } */
+  printf ("%hc", i);
+  printf ("%hs", hn);
+  printf ("%hp", p); /* { dg-warning "length" "bad use of %h" } */
+  printf ("%h"); /* { dg-warning "conversion lacks type" "bare %h" } */
+  printf ("%ld%li%lo%lu%lx%lX", l, l, ul, ul, ul, ul);
+  printf ("%ln", ln);
+  printf ("%lf", d); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "bad use of %l" } */
+  printf ("%le", d); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "bad use of %l" } */
+  printf ("%lE", d); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "bad use of %l" } */
+  printf ("%lg", d); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "bad use of %l" } */
+  printf ("%lG", d); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "bad use of %l" } */
+  printf ("%lp", p); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "bad use of %l" } */
+  /* These next two were added in C94, but should be objected to in C90.
+     For the first one, GCC has wanted wchar_t instead of the correct C94
+     and C99 wint_t.
+  */
+  printf ("%lc", lc); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "C90 bad use of %l" } */
+  printf ("%ls", ls); /* { dg-warning "length|C" "C90 bad use of %l" } */
+  /* Valid uses of each bare conversion.  */
+  printf ("%d%i%o%u%x%X%f%e%E%g%G%c%s%p%n%%", i, i, u, u, u, u, d, d, d, d, d,
+	  i, s, p, n);
+  /* Uses of the - flag (valid on all non-%, non-n conversions).  */
+  printf ("%-d%-i%-o%-u%-x%-X%-f%-e%-E%-g%-G%-c%-s%-p", i, i, u, u, u, u,
+	  d, d, d, d, d, i, s, p);
+  printf ("%-n", n); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of %-n" } */
+  /* Uses of the + flag (valid on signed conversions only).  */
+  printf ("%+d%+i%+f%+e%+E%+g%+G\n", i, i, d, d, d, d, d);
+  printf ("%+o", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+u", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+x", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+X", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+c", i); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+s", s); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+p", p); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  printf ("%+n", n); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of + flag" } */
+  /* Uses of the space flag (valid on signed conversions only, and ignored
+     with +).
+  */
+  printf ("% +d", i); /* { dg-warning "use of both|ignored" "use of space and + flags" } */
+  printf ("%+ d", i); /* { dg-warning "use of both|ignored" "use of space and + flags" } */
+  printf ("% d% i% f% e% E% g% G\n", i, i, d, d, d, d, d);
+  printf ("% o", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% u", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% x", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% X", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% c", i); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% s", s); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% p", p); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  printf ("% n", n); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of space flag" } */
+  /* Uses of the # flag.  */
+  printf ("%#o%#x%#X%#e%#E%#f%#g%#G", u, u, u, d, d, d, d, d);
+  printf ("%#d", i); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  printf ("%#i", i); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  printf ("%#u", u); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  printf ("%#c", i); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  printf ("%#s", s); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  printf ("%#p", p); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  printf ("%#n", n); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of # flag" } */
+  /* Uses of the 0 flag.  */
+  printf ("%08d%08i%08o%08u%08x%08X%08e%08E%08f%08g%08G", i, i, u, u, u, u,
+	  d, d, d, d, d);
+  printf ("%0c", i); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of 0 flag" } */
+  printf ("%0s", s); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of 0 flag" } */
+  printf ("%0p", p); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of 0 flag" } */
+  printf ("%0n", n); /* { dg-warning "flag" "bad use of 0 flag" } */
+  /* 0 flag ignored with - flag.  */
+  printf ("%-08d", i); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08i", i); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08o", u); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08u", u); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08x", u); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08X", u); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08e", d); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08E", d); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08f", d); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08g", d); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  printf ("%-08G", d); /* { dg-warning "flags|ignored" "0 flag ignored with - flag" } */
+  /* Various tests of bad argument types.  */
+  printf ("%d", l); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  printf ("%ld", i); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  printf ("%s", n); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  printf ("%p", i); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  printf ("%n", p); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  /* With -pedantic, we want some further checks for pointer targets:
+     %p should allow only pointers to void (possibly qualified) and
+     to character types (possibly qualified), but not function pointers
+     or pointers to other types.  (Whether, in fact, character types are
+     allowed here is unclear; see thread on comp.std.c, July 2000 for
+     discussion of the requirements of rules on identical representation,
+     and of the application of the as if rule with the new va_arg
+     allowances in C99 to printf.)  Likewise, we should warn if
+     pointer targets differ in signedness, except in some circumstances
+     for character pointers.  (In C99 we should consider warning for
+     char * or unsigned char * being passed to %hhn, even if strictly
+     legitimate by the standard.)
+  */
+  printf ("%p", foo); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  printf ("%n", un); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  printf ("%p", n); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  /* Allow character pointers with %p.  */
+  printf ("%p%p%p%p", s, ss, us, css);
+  /* %s allows any character type.  */
+  printf ("%s%s%s%s", s, ss, us, css);
+  /* Warning for void * arguments for %s is GCC's historical behavior,
+     and seems useful to keep, even if some standard versions might be
+     read to permit it.
+  */
+  printf ("%s", p); /* { dg-warning "format" "bad argument types" } */
+  /* The historical behavior is to allow signed / unsigned types
+     interchangably as arguments.  For values representable in both types,
+     such usage may be correct.  For now preserve the behavior of GCC
+     in such cases.
+  */
+  printf ("%d", u);
+  /* Wrong number of arguments.  */
+  printf ("%d%d", i); /* { dg-warning "arguments" "wrong number of args" } */
+  printf ("%d", i, i); /* { dg-warning "arguments" "wrong number of args" } */
+  /* Miscellaneous bogus constructions.  */
+  printf (""); /* { dg-warning "zero-length" "warning for empty format" } */
+  printf ("\0"); /* { dg-warning "embedded" "warning for embedded NUL" } */
+  printf ("%d\0", i); /* { dg-warning "embedded" "warning for embedded NUL" } */
+  printf ("%d\0%d", i, i); /* { dg-warning "embedded|too many" "warning for embedded NUL" } */
+  printf (NULL); /* { dg-warning "null" "null format string warning" } */
+  printf ("%"); /* { dg-warning "trailing" "trailing % warning" } */
+  printf ("%++d", i); /* { dg-warning "repeated" "repeated flag warning" } */
+  printf ("%n", cn); /* { dg-warning "constant" "%n with const" } */
+  printf ((const char *)L"foo"); /* { dg-warning "wide" "wide string" } */
+  printf ("%n", (int *)0); /* { dg-warning "null" "%n with NULL" } */
+  printf ("%s", (char *)0); /* { dg-warning "null" "%s with NULL" } */
+}