obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream

verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig;
imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball.

downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag
should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical
to the one extracted from the above tarball.

if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone',
however, do note that line-endings of files in your working
directory might differ from line-endings of the respective
files in the upstream repository.

1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/980310-8.f b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/980310-8.f
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c20f2d720
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/980310-8.f
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+c { dg-do compile }
+C To: egcs-bugs@cygnus.com
+C Subject: egcs-g77 and array indexing
+C Reply-To: etseidl@jutland.ca.sandia.gov
+C Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 10:38:27 -0800
+C From: Edward Seidl <etseidl@jutland.ca.sandia.gov>
+C
+C I have some horrible spaghetti code I'm trying compile with egcs-g77,
+C but it's puking on code like the example below.  I have no idea if it's
+C legal fortran or not, and I'm in no position to change it.  All I do know
+C is it compiles with a number of other compilers, including f2c and
+C g77-0.5.19.1/gcc-2.7.2.1.  When I try to compile with egcs-2.90.18 971122
+C I get the following (on both i686-pc-linux-gnu and
+C alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu):
+C
+Cfoo.f: In subroutine `foobar':
+Cfoo.f:11: 
+C         subroutine foobar(norb,nnorb)
+C                           ^
+CArray `norb' at (^) is too large to handle
+
+      program foo
+      implicit integer(A-Z)
+      dimension norb(6)
+      nnorb=6
+
+      call foobar(norb,nnorb)
+
+      stop
+      end
+
+      subroutine foobar(norb,nnorb)
+      implicit integer(A-Z)
+      dimension norb(-1:*)
+
+      do 10 i=-1,nnorb-2
+        norb(i) = i+999
+  10  continue
+
+      return
+      end