1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ee352fabf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// { dg-do assemble  }
+// GROUPS passed arg-matching
+// arg-matching file
+// Message-Id: <199405132049.QAA06835@elan.cs.UMD.EDU>
+// Subject: Bug in g++ 2.4.5 and 2.5.8
+// Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 16:49:22 -0400
+// From: Evan Rosser <ejr@cs.umd.edu>
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+class TupleIterator {
+public:
+    TupleIterator(int *tpl);
+    int& operator*();
+    int  live() const;
+// The compile fails with "no post-increment operator for type" at "TI++"
+// below.
+// It succeeds with the same declarations if set_position does not take an int.
+// This occurs with G++ 2.4.5 and 2.5.8.
+// Sun CC works OK with either case.
+        void operator++(int);
+        void set_position(int);
+private:
+};
+
+int main() {
+
+int t[5];
+t[1] = 1; t[2] = 2;t[3] = 3;t[4] = 4;
+TupleIterator TI(t);
+
+    while(TI.live()){
+        printf("%d", *TI);
+        TI++;
+    }
+}
+