summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/unify6.C
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/unify6.C')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/unify6.C41
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/unify6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/unify6.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0e5c03495
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/unify6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// { dg-do assemble }
+
+// Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+// Contributed by Nathan Sidwell 21 May 1999 <nathan@acm.org>
+
+// Template deduction and type unification should not issue diagnostics when
+// they're trying to see if it's possible. Here deduction fails in some cases
+// because you cant cv qualify a function type.
+
+template<class T> void fn(){} // A
+
+template<class T> void fn(T const *){} // B
+
+// these next two specializations need to know if they're specializing A or B.
+// They specialize A, because they can't instantiate B.
+
+template<> void fn<int &>() {} // ok, specialize A
+
+template<> void fn<void ()>() {} // ok, specialize A
+
+// now make sure we moan when we really should
+template<class T> void foo(T const *){} // { dg-message "note" }
+
+void f()
+{
+ foo<int &>(); // { dg-error "" } attempt to build int & const *
+ // { dg-message "candidate" "candidate note" { target *-*-* } 26 }
+ foo<void ()>(); // { dg-error "" } attempt to build void (const *)()
+ // { dg-message "candidate" "candidate note" { target *-*-* } 28 }
+}
+
+typedef void (*Fptr)();
+
+template<class T> void PV(Fptr const &, T const * const &);
+template<class T1, class T2> void PV(T1 const * const &, T2 const * const &);
+
+void baz()
+{
+ void *t;
+ PV(&baz, t);
+}