summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f9025
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5b0d28a0d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! Tests the fix for pr28914, in which array constructors using the loop
+! variable within a do loop for the implied do loop of the constructor
+! would result in a corrupted do loop counter.
+!
+! Based on the testscase by Ed Korkven <kornkven@arsc.edu>
+!
+program pr28914
+ implicit none
+ integer n, i
+ parameter (n = 66000) ! Problem manifests for n > 65535
+ double precision a(n), summation
+
+ summation = 0.0
+ do i = 1, 1
+ a = (/ (i, i = 1, n) /) ! This is legal and was broken
+ a = sqrt(a)
+ summation = SUM(a)
+ enddo
+ summation = abs(summation - 11303932.9138271_8)
+
+ if (summation.gt.0.00001) call abort()
+end program pr28914
+
+