summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f48
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fa0a28a1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_large_real }
+! Tests the fix for PR35944/6/7, in which the variable array constructors below
+! were incorrectly translated and wrong code was produced.
+!
+! Contributed by Dick Hendrickson <dick.hendrickson@gmail.com>
+!
+ program try_fa6013
+ call fa6013 (10, 1, -1)
+ call fa6077 (10, 1, -1, (/1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10/))
+ call fa2083
+ end program
+
+ subroutine FA6013 (nf10, nf1, mf1)
+ integer, parameter :: kv = 4
+ REAL(KV) DDA1(10)
+ REAL(KV) DDA2(10)
+ REAL(KV) DDA(10), dval
+ dda = (/1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10/)
+ DDA1 = ATAN2 ((/(REAL(J1,KV),J1=1,10)/),
+ $ REAL((/(J1,J1=nf10,nf1,mf1)/), KV)) !fails
+ DDA2 = ATAN2 (DDA, DDA(10:1:-1))
+ if (any (DDA1 - DDA2 .gt. epsilon(dval))) call abort ()
+ END
+
+ subroutine FA6077 (nf10,nf1,mf1, ida)
+ INTEGER IDA1(10)
+ INTEGER IDA2(10), ida(10)
+ IDA1 = IEOR((/1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10/),
+ $ (/(IDA(J1),J1=10,1,-1)/) )
+ IDA2 = IEOR ((/1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10/), (/10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1/) )
+ if (any (ida1 .ne. ida2)) call abort ()
+ END SUBROUTINE
+
+ subroutine fa2083
+ implicit none
+ integer j1,k
+ parameter (k=selected_real_kind (precision (0.0_8) + 1)) ! failed
+ REAL(k) QDA1(10)
+ REAL(k) QDA(10), qval
+ qda = (/ 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 /)
+ QDA1 = MOD ( 1.1_k*( QDA(1) -5.0_k), P=( QDA -2.5_k))
+ DO J1 = 1,10
+ QVAL = MOD(1.1_k*(QDA(1)-5.0_k),P=(QDA(J1)-2.5_k))
+ if (qval - qda1(j1) .gt. epsilon(qval)) call abort ()
+ ENDDO
+ END
+