1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_11.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_11.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d33acd10a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_11.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! 
+! PR fortran/34760
+! The problem with implict typing is that it is unclear
+! whether an existing symbol is a variable or a function.
+! Thus it remains long FL_UNKNOWN, which causes extra 
+! problems; it was failing here since ISTAT was not
+! FL_VARIABLE but still FL_UNKNOWN.
+!
+! Test case contributed by Dick Hendrickson.
+!
+     MODULE TESTS
+       PRIVATE :: ISTAT
+       PUBLIC :: ISTAT2
+     CONTAINS
+     SUBROUTINE AD0001
+     REAL RLA1(:)
+     ALLOCATABLE RLA1
+     ISTAT = -314
+     ALLOCATE (RLA1(NF10), STAT = ISTAT)
+     ALLOCATE (RLA1(NF10), STAT = ISTAT2)
+     END SUBROUTINE
+     END MODULE
+
+     MODULE TESTS2
+       PRIVATE :: ISTAT2
+     CONTAINS
+     function istat2()
+       istat2 = 0
+     end function istat2
+     SUBROUTINE AD0001
+       REAL RLA1(:)
+       ALLOCATABLE RLA1
+       ALLOCATE (RLA1(NF10), STAT = ISTAT2) ! { dg-error "is not a variable" }
+     END SUBROUTINE
+     END MODULE tests2
+
+! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "TESTS" } }