summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_1.f90
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_1.f90')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_1.f9050
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_1.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3ca6bcb17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_1.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! Tests the patch for PR27613, in which directly recursive, scalar
+! functions were generating an "unclassifiable statement" error
+! for the recursive statement(s). This was subsequently determined
+! to be wrong code and the error on 'bad_stuff' was removed.
+! See 12.5.2.1 of the standard and PR30876.
+!
+! Based on PR testcase by Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@gmail.com>
+!
+program test
+ if (original_stuff(1) .ne. 5) call abort ()
+ if (scalar_stuff(-4) .ne. 10) call abort ()
+ if (any (array_stuff((/-19,-30/)) .ne. (/25,25/))) call abort ()
+contains
+ recursive function original_stuff(n)
+ integer :: original_stuff
+ integer :: n
+ original_stuff = 1
+ if(n < 5) then
+ original_stuff = original_stuff + original_stuff (n+1) ! { dg-error "name of a recursive function" }
+ endif
+ end function original_stuff
+
+ recursive function scalar_stuff(n) result (tmp)
+ integer :: tmp
+ integer :: n
+ tmp = 1
+ if(n < 5) then
+ tmp = tmp + scalar_stuff (n+1)
+ endif
+ end function scalar_stuff
+
+ recursive function array_stuff(n) result (tmp)
+ integer :: tmp (2)
+ integer :: n (2)
+ tmp = 1
+ if(maxval (n) < 5) then
+ tmp = tmp + array_stuff (n+1)
+ endif
+ end function array_stuff
+
+ recursive function bad_stuff(n)
+ integer :: bad_stuff (2)
+ integer :: n(2)
+ bad_stuff = 1
+ if(maxval (n) < 5) then
+ bad_stuff = bad_stuff + bad_stuff (n+1)
+ endif
+ end function bad_stuff
+end program test