summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_4.f90
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_4.f90')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_4.f9021
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_4.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_4.f90
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2f0efccf3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_4.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-options "-std=legacy" }
+!
+! Tests the fix for PR29389, in which the statement function would not be
+! recognised as PURE within a PURE procedure.
+
+! Contributed by Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ INTEGER :: st1, i = 99, a(4), q = 6
+ st1 (i) = i * i * i
+ FORALL(i=1:4) a(i) = st1 (i)
+ FORALL(i=1:4) a(i) = u (a(i)) - a(i)** 2
+ if (any (a .ne. 0)) call abort ()
+ if (i .ne. 99) call abort ()
+contains
+ pure integer function u (x)
+ integer,intent(in) :: x
+ st2 (i) = i * i
+ u = st2(x)
+ end function
+end