blob: ec4dad70620dcba591e9a960db8d810eba15d1b4 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
|
// PR c++/20280
// { dg-do compile }
// Gimplification of the COND_EXPR used to fail because it had an
// addressable type, and create_tmp_var rejected that.
struct A
{
~A();
};
struct B : A {};
A& foo();
void bar(bool b)
{
(B&) (b ? foo() : foo());
}
// Make sure bit-fields and addressable types don't cause crashes.
// These were not in the original bug report.
// Added by Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
// Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation
struct X
{
long i : 32, j, k : 32;
};
void g(long&);
void h(const long&);
void f(X &x, bool b)
{
(b ? x.i : x.j) = 1;
(b ? x.j : x.k) = 2;
(b ? x.i : x.k) = 3;
(void)(b ? x.i : x.j);
(void)(b ? x.i : x.k);
(void)(b ? x.j : x.k);
g (b ? x.i : x.j); // { dg-error "cannot bind bitfield" }
g (b ? x.i : x.k); // { dg-error "cannot bind bitfield" }
g (b ? x.j : x.k); // { dg-error "cannot bind bitfield" }
// It's not entirely clear whether these should be accepted. The
// conditional expressions are lvalues for sure, and 8.5.3/5 exempts
// lvalues for bit-fields, but it's not clear that conditional
// expressions that are lvalues and that have at least one possible
// result that is a bit-field lvalue meets this condition.
h (b ? x.i : x.j);
h (b ? x.i : x.k);
h (b ? x.j : x.k);
(long &)(b ? x.i : x.j); // { dg-error "address of bit-field" }
(long &)(b ? x.i : x.k); // { dg-error "address of bit-field" }
(long &)(b ? x.j : x.k); // { dg-error "address of bit-field" }
}
|
