summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/doc/languages.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorupstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400
committerupstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400
commit554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd (patch)
tree976dc5ab7fddf506dadce60ae936f43f58787092 /gcc/doc/languages.texi
downloadcbb-gcc-4.6.4-554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd.tar.bz2
cbb-gcc-4.6.4-554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd.tar.xz
obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream
verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/doc/languages.texi')
-rw-r--r--gcc/doc/languages.texi36
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/doc/languages.texi b/gcc/doc/languages.texi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..df45c1778
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/doc/languages.texi
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+@c Copyright (C) 2002, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c This is part of the GCC manual.
+@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
+
+@node Languages
+@chapter Language Front Ends in GCC
+
+The interface to front ends for languages in GCC, and in particular
+the @code{tree} structure (@pxref{GENERIC}), was initially designed for
+C, and many aspects of it are still somewhat biased towards C and
+C-like languages. It is, however, reasonably well suited to other
+procedural languages, and front ends for many such languages have been
+written for GCC@.
+
+Writing a compiler as a front end for GCC, rather than compiling
+directly to assembler or generating C code which is then compiled by
+GCC, has several advantages:
+
+@itemize @bullet
+@item GCC front ends benefit from the support for many different
+target machines already present in GCC@.
+@item GCC front ends benefit from all the optimizations in GCC@. Some
+of these, such as alias analysis, may work better when GCC is
+compiling directly from source code then when it is compiling from
+generated C code.
+@item Better debugging information is generated when compiling
+directly from source code than when going via intermediate generated C
+code.
+@end itemize
+
+Because of the advantages of writing a compiler as a GCC front end,
+GCC front ends have also been created for languages very different
+from those for which GCC was designed, such as the declarative
+logic/functional language Mercury. For these reasons, it may also be
+useful to implement compilers created for specialized purposes (for
+example, as part of a research project) as GCC front ends.