summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorupstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400
committerupstream source tree <ports@midipix.org>2015-03-15 20:14:05 -0400
commit554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd (patch)
tree976dc5ab7fddf506dadce60ae936f43f58787092 /libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java
downloadcbb-gcc-4.6.4-554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd.tar.bz2
cbb-gcc-4.6.4-554fd8c5195424bdbcabf5de30fdc183aba391bd.tar.xz
obtained gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2 from upstream website;upstream
verified gcc-4.6.4.tar.bz2.sig; imported gcc-4.6.4 source tree from verified upstream tarball. downloading a git-generated archive based on the 'upstream' tag should provide you with a source tree that is binary identical to the one extracted from the above tarball. if you have obtained the source via the command 'git clone', however, do note that line-endings of files in your working directory might differ from line-endings of the respective files in the upstream repository.
Diffstat (limited to 'libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java')
-rw-r--r--libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java88
1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java b/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..17370b537
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/newarray_overflow.java
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/* This test checks for two slightly different overflow scenarios in
+ * array allocation.
+ *
+ * The first is that the number of bytes needed for an array size
+ * overflows on a 32 bit machine.
+ *
+ * The second is that on a 64 machine, the number of bytes silently
+ * gets truncated, resulting in too small an object being
+ * allocated. */
+
+class newarray_overflow
+{
+ static boolean failed = false;
+
+ static void int_check()
+ {
+ int[] x;
+ try
+ {
+ x = new int [1 << 30];
+ }
+ catch (OutOfMemoryError e)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+ /* If we really get away with it (64 bit machine), that's cool. */
+ if (x == null) {
+ System.err.println ("int check: new returned null.");
+ failed = true;
+ return;
+ }
+ try
+ {
+ // Only check a few places so we don't thrash too badly.
+ for (int i = 0; i < x.length; i += (1 << 24))
+ if (x[i] != 0)
+ failed = true;
+ }
+ catch (Throwable e)
+ {
+ System.err.print ("int check: ");
+ System.err.println (e);
+ failed = true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ static void object_check()
+ {
+ Object[] x;
+ try
+ {
+ x = new Object [1 << 30];
+ System.err.println ("Alloc succeeded.");
+ System.err.println (x);
+ }
+ catch (OutOfMemoryError e)
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+ /* If we really get away with it (64 bit machine), that's cool. */
+ if (x == null) {
+ System.err.println ("Object check: new returned null.");
+ failed = true;
+ return;
+ }
+ try
+ {
+ for (int i = 0; i < x.length; i += (1 << 24))
+ if (x[i] != null)
+ failed = true;
+ }
+ catch (Throwable e)
+ {
+ System.err.print ("Object check: ");
+ System.err.println (e);
+ failed = true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ public static void main (String[] ignore)
+ {
+ int_check();
+ object_check();
+
+ if (!failed)
+ System.out.println ("ok");
+ }
+}